• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国在实现健康信息交换全面实施方面面临的障碍。

Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.

机构信息

School of Health Administration, College of Allied Health Professions, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.

DOI:10.2196/medinform.3625
PMID:25600635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4288063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although health information exchanges (HIE) have existed since their introduction by President Bush in his 2004 State of the Union Address, and despite monetary incentives earmarked in 2009 by the health information technology for economic and clinical health (HITECH) Act, adoption of HIE has been sparse in the United States. Research has been conducted to explore the concept of HIE and its benefit to patients, but viable business plans for their existence are rare, and so far, no research has been conducted on the dynamic nature of barriers over time.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to map the barriers mentioned in the literature to illustrate the effect, if any, of barriers discussed with respect to the HITECH Act from 2009 to the early months of 2014.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review from CINAHL, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search criteria primarily focused on studies. Each article was read by at least two of the authors, and a final set was established for evaluation (n=28).

RESULTS

The 28 articles identified 16 barriers. Cost and efficiency/workflow were identified 15% and 13% of all instances of barriers mentioned in literature, respectively. The years 2010 and 2011 were the most plentiful years when barriers were discussed, with 75% and 69% of all barriers listed, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of barriers mentioned in literature demonstrates the mindfulness of users, developers, and both local and national government. The broad conclusion is that public policy masks the effects of some barriers, while revealing others. However, a deleterious effect can be inferred when the public funds are exhausted. Public policy will need to lever incentives to overcome many of the barriers such as cost and impediments to competition. Process improvement managers need to optimize the efficiency of current practices at the point of care. Developers will need to work with users to ensure tools that use HIE resources work into existing workflows.

摘要

背景

尽管自布什总统在 2004 年国情咨文中提出健康信息交换(HIE)以来,HIE 就已经存在,并且尽管 2009 年的《健康信息技术经济和临床健康法案》(HITECH 法案)专门为此提供了资金激励,但 HIE 的采用在美国仍然很少。人们已经对 HIE 的概念及其对患者的益处进行了研究,但很少有可行的商业计划来支持其存在,而且到目前为止,还没有针对随着时间的推移障碍的动态性质进行研究。

目的

本研究旨在对文献中提到的障碍进行映射,以说明 2009 年至 2014 年初 HITECH 法案期间讨论的障碍对 HIE 的影响(如果有影响的话)。

方法

我们从 CINAHL、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统的文献回顾。搜索标准主要侧重于研究。每篇文章至少由两位作者阅读,并最终确定了一组进行评估(n=28)。

结果

确定的 28 篇文章共确定了 16 个障碍。成本和效率/工作流程分别占文献中提到的障碍的 15%和 13%。讨论障碍最多的年份是 2010 年和 2011 年,分别占列出的所有障碍的 75%和 69%。

结论

文献中提到的障碍的频率表明了用户、开发者以及地方和国家政府的关注。广泛的结论是,公共政策掩盖了一些障碍的影响,同时又揭示了另一些障碍的影响。但是,当公共资金耗尽时,可以推断出不利影响。公共政策将需要利用激励措施来克服许多障碍,例如成本和竞争障碍。流程改进经理需要在护理点优化当前实践的效率。开发人员将需要与用户合作,确保使用 HIE 资源的工具能够融入现有的工作流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4b4/4288063/5c33a7a968b5/medinform_v2i2e26_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4b4/4288063/5c33a7a968b5/medinform_v2i2e26_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4b4/4288063/5c33a7a968b5/medinform_v2i2e26_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.美国在实现健康信息交换全面实施方面面临的障碍。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.
2
Adoption Factors of the Electronic Health Record: A Systematic Review.电子健康记录的采用因素:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jun 1;4(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5525.
3
Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录采用的障碍:一项系统文献综述。
J Med Syst. 2016 Dec;40(12):252. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
4
Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(HITECH)财政激励措施对小型医生所有诊所采用电子健康记录(EHR)的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
5
Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review.长期护理机构中与电子健康记录相关的采用因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006615.
6
Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review.与健康信息技术采用相关的因素:基于系统评价的概念模型。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 23;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3106.
7
Barriers to cross--institutional health information exchange: a literature review.跨机构健康信息交换的障碍:文献综述
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2010 Summer;24(3):22-34.
8
Health care provider perceptions of a query-based health information exchange: barriers and benefits.医疗服务提供者对基于查询的健康信息交换的看法:障碍与益处
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Jun 3;22(2):302-8. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.135.
9
Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review.健康信息交流的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
10
Health information exchange among U.S. hospitals: who's in, who's out, and why?美国医院间的健康信息交流:谁参与,谁不参与,以及原因是什么?
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar;2(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of an EHR-integrated web-based depression assessment in primary care: PORTAL-Depression.在初级保健中实施基于电子健康记录(EHR)集成的网络抑郁症评估:PORTAL-抑郁症评估。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Sep 24;7(3):ooae094. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae094. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.2014年至2020年南卡罗来纳州各医院健康信息交换参与情况的成功与障碍:纵向观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 28;11:e40959. doi: 10.2196/40959.
3
Asymmetric Interoperability as a Strategy Among Provider Group Health Information Exchange: Directional Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Health information exchange, system size and information silos.健康信息交换、系统规模与信息孤岛
J Health Econ. 2014 Jan;33:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
2
Emergency physicians' perspectives on their use of health information exchange.急诊医师对其使用健康信息交换的看法。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;63(3):329-37. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
3
Challenges, alternatives, and paths to sustainability for health information exchange efforts.健康信息交换工作在可持续性方面面临的挑战、替代方案及路径。
供应商集团健康信息交换中的非对称互操作性策略:定向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43127. doi: 10.2196/43127.
4
Investigating a Work System Approach to Implement an Emergency Department Surge Management System: Case Study.研究一种工作系统方法来实施急诊科拥堵管理系统:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e37472. doi: 10.2196/37472.
5
Hospital's adoption of multiple methods of obtaining outside information and use of that information.医院采用多种获取外部信息的方法并加以利用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1489-1496. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac079.
6
How to Implement Digital Services in a Way That They Integrate Into Routine Work: Qualitative Interview Study Among Health and Social Care Professionals.如何以融入日常工作的方式实施数字服务:卫生和社会保健专业人员的定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 1;23(12):e31668. doi: 10.2196/31668.
7
The Need for Sustainable Teleconsultation Systems in the Aftermath of the First COVID-19 Wave.新冠疫情第一波冲击后对可持续远程会诊系统的需求
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 5;22(10):e21211. doi: 10.2196/21211.
8
Health Data Sharing in US Nursing Homes: A Mixed Methods Study.美国养老院中的健康数据共享:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 May;22(5):1052-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
9
Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers' Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study.影响门诊医疗服务提供者与附属及非附属合作伙伴进行健康信息电子交换的关键因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 7;7(4):e12000. doi: 10.2196/12000.
10
Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program.撰写一篇可供发表在健康相关学位课程中的系统评价。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 14;8(10):e15490. doi: 10.2196/15490.
J Med Syst. 2013 Dec;37(6):9987. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9987-7. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
4
Hospital electronic health information exchange grew substantially in 2008-12.2008-12 年期间,医院间电子健康信息交换大幅增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1346-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0010.
5
Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long-term funding remains a concern.运营健康信息交换显示出大幅增长,但长期资金仍然是一个关注点。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1486-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0124. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
6
Health information exchange system usage patterns in three communities: practice sites, users, patients, and data.三个社区的健康信息交换系统使用模式:实践场所、用户、患者和数据。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Sep;82(9):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
7
Interest in health information exchange in ambulatory care: a statewide survey.对门诊护理中健康信息交换的兴趣:一项全州范围的调查。
Appl Clin Inform. 2010 Feb 3;1(1):1-10. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2009-10-RA-0007. Print 2010.
8
The impact of EHR and HIE on reducing avoidable admissions: controlling main differential diagnoses.电子健康档案和健康信息交换对降低可避免住院的影响:控制主要鉴别诊断。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 17;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-49.
9
Infection preventionists' awareness of and engagement in health information exchange to improve public health surveillance.感染防控专家对健康信息交换的认识和参与,以改善公共卫生监测。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Sep;41(9):787-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.022. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
Perceptions regarding the ease of use and usefulness of health information exchange systems among medical providers, case managers and non-clinical staff members working in HIV care and community settings.医疗提供者、个案管理者以及在 HIV 护理和社区环境中工作的非临床工作人员对健康信息交换系统的易用性和有用性的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):e21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Jul 31.