Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Genet. 2011 Oct;80(4):346-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01646.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a connective tissue disorder with major features in cardiovascular, ocular and skeletal systems. Recently, diagnostic criteria were revised where more weight was given to the aortic root dilatation. We applied the revised Marfan nosology in an established adult Marfan population to define practical repercussions of novel criteria for clinical practice and individual patients. Out of 180 MFS patients, in 91% (n = 164) the diagnosis of MFS remained. Out of 16 patients with rejected diagnosis, four patients were diagnosed as MASS (myopia, mitral valve prolapse, borderline non-progressive aortic root dilatation, skeletal findings and striae) phenotype, three as ectopia lentis syndrome and in nine patients no alternative diagnosis was established. In 13 patients, the diagnosis was rejected because the Z-score of the aortic root was <2, although the aortic diameter was larger than 40 mm in six of them. In three other patients, the diagnosis of MFS was rejected because dural ectasia was given less weight in the revised nosology. Following the revised Marfan nosology, the diagnosis of MFS was rejected in 9% of patients, mostly because of the absence of aortic root dilatation defined as Z-score ≥2. Currently used Z-scores seem to underestimate aortic root dilatation, especially in patients with large body surface area (BSA). We recommend re-evaluation of criteria for aortic root involvement in adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of MFS.
马凡综合征(MFS)是一种结缔组织疾病,主要特征存在于心血管、眼和骨骼系统。最近,诊断标准进行了修订,更加重视主动脉根部扩张。我们在已建立的成年马凡综合征人群中应用修订后的马凡综合征分类学,以确定新的诊断标准对临床实践和个体患者的实际影响。在 180 名 MFS 患者中,91%(n=164)仍诊断为 MFS。在被拒绝诊断的 16 名患者中,4 名患者被诊断为 MASS(近视、二尖瓣脱垂、边界性非进行性主动脉根部扩张、骨骼表现和条纹)表型,3 名患者被诊断为晶状体异位综合征,9 名患者未确定其他替代诊断。在 13 名患者中,由于主动脉根部 Z 分数<2,尽管其中 6 名患者的主动脉直径大于 40mm,但诊断被拒绝。在另外 3 名患者中,由于在修订后的分类学中硬膜扩张的权重降低,MFS 的诊断被拒绝。根据修订后的马凡综合征分类学,9%的患者被拒绝诊断为 MFS,主要是因为缺乏定义为 Z 分数≥2 的主动脉根部扩张。目前使用的 Z 分数似乎低估了主动脉根部扩张,尤其是在体表面积(BSA)较大的患者中。我们建议重新评估疑似 MFS 成年患者主动脉根部受累的标准。