Metharom Ekkaphon, Galettis Peter, Manners Susan, Jelinek Maria, Liauw Winston, de Souza Paul L, Hoskins Janelle M, Links Matthew
Cancer Pharmacology Therapeutics Group Medical Oncology, St George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;7(1):65-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01354.x. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
Controversy exists over the optimal dosing for the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine. A pharmacological advantage is achieved by prolonging infusion times but evidence for a clinical benefit has been conflicting. We hypothesized that polymorphisms in genes involved in gemcitabine accumulation, particularly the cytidine deaminase CDA c.79A>C, may influence the optimal dosing regimen in individual patients.
DNA was collected from 32 patients participating in a randomized crossover study comparing 30-min with 100-min infusions of gemcitabine. The relationships between seven polymorphisms among three genes (CDA, RRM1 and DCK) and (i) gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation; (ii) gemcitabine-induced toxicity; and (iii) dose delivery were examined for each infusion time and week of administration.
There were trends for increased accumulation of gemcitabine-triphosphate (GEM-TP) with the variant alleles of CDA c.79A>C, and RRM1-37C>A and -524T>C but none of these reached statistical significance in a univariate analysis. In a multivariable model there were significant effects of infusion duration and week of administration on GEM-TP accumulation. There were significant interactions between CDA c.79A>C (P=0.01) and RRM1-37C>A (P=0.019) genotypes, infusion time, and arm. More patients with one or two CDA c.79 variant alleles had doses delays (57 vs 13 %, P=0.03) and a pharmacological advantage for prolonged infusion after week 1.
It is important to consider both pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in optimizing gemcitabine accumulation. This represents a classical interaction between genes and environment and provides support for the consideration of both CDA genotype and infusion duration in development of an individualized dosing strategy.
核苷类似物吉西他滨的最佳给药剂量存在争议。延长输注时间可获得药理学优势,但临床获益的证据一直存在矛盾。我们推测,参与吉西他滨蓄积的基因多态性,尤其是胞苷脱氨酶CDA基因c.79A>C多态性,可能会影响个体患者的最佳给药方案。
从32例参与随机交叉研究的患者中收集DNA,该研究比较了吉西他滨30分钟输注与100分钟输注的效果。研究了三个基因(CDA、RRM1和DCK)中七个多态性与(i)吉西他滨三磷酸蓄积;(ii)吉西他滨诱导的毒性;以及(iii)每次输注时间和给药周数的剂量递送之间的关系。
CDA基因c.79A>C、RRM1基因-37C>A和-524T>C的变异等位基因有使吉西他滨三磷酸(GEM-TP)蓄积增加的趋势,但在单变量分析中这些均未达到统计学意义。在多变量模型中,输注持续时间和给药周数对GEM-TP蓄积有显著影响。CDA基因c.79A>C(P=0.01)和RRM1基因-37C>A(P=0.019)基因型、输注时间和分组之间存在显著相互作用。携带一个或两个CDA基因c.79变异等位基因的患者中有更多出现剂量延迟(57%对13%,P=0.03),且在第1周后延长输注具有药理学优势。
在优化吉西他滨蓄积时,考虑药代动力学和药物遗传学都很重要。这代表了基因与环境之间的经典相互作用,并为在制定个体化给药策略时考虑CDA基因型和输注持续时间提供了支持。