Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and The University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Mar;9(1):61-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00201.x.
Patients with solitary (or few) brain metastases are often treated with surgery (S) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This review examines the randomised evidence supporting this aggressive approach. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for published papers and Abstracts on relevant randomised trials was undertaken. Fourteen randomised trials were identified, 11 final reports and 3 Abstracts, investigating various combinations of S, SRS and WBRT. Most of these trials had significant limitations and the results therefore need to be viewed with caution. Surgery and SRS improve local control, maintenance of performance status and survival for favourable prognosis patients with solitary brain metastases relative to WBRT alone, although the absolute survival benefit for the majority is modest. Limited data suggest similar outcomes from S and SRS, but few patients are truly suitable for both options. For multiple (2-4) brain metastases, SRS improves local control and functional outcome but not survival; there is no randomised evidence for S. Adjuvant WBRT also improves intracranial control but not survival; however, the neurocognitive risk : benefit ratio of WBRT remains controversial. Quality of life data are currently limited.
患有单发(或少数)脑转移瘤的患者通常采用手术(S)或立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)联合或不联合辅助全脑放疗(WBRT)进行治疗。本综述考察了支持这种积极治疗方法的随机证据。对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中关于相关随机试验的已发表论文和摘要进行了检索。共确定了 14 项随机试验,其中包括 11 项最终报告和 3 项摘要,这些试验研究了 S、SRS 和 WBRT 的各种组合。这些试验中的大多数都存在显著的局限性,因此,其结果需要谨慎看待。对于具有单发脑转移瘤且预后良好的患者,手术和 SRS 可改善局部控制、保持功能状态和生存,与单独接受 WBRT 相比,但大多数患者的绝对生存获益较小。有限的数据表明 S 和 SRS 的结果相似,但很少有患者真正适合这两种选择。对于 2-4 个脑转移瘤,SRS 可改善局部控制和功能结局,但不能改善生存;目前尚无关于 S 的随机证据。辅助 WBRT 也可改善颅内控制,但不能改善生存;然而,WBRT 的神经认知风险:获益比仍存在争议。目前,生活质量数据有限。