• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西区步行者 65+:一项基于初级保健的针对老年人步行干预的随机对照试验:研究背景和设计。

West End Walkers 65+: a randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based walking intervention for older adults: study rationale and design.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Jordanhill Campus, 76 Southbrae Drive, Glasgow, G13 1PP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 19;11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-120.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-120
PMID:21333020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3050749/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Scotland, older adults are a key target group for physical activity intervention due to the large proportion who are inactive. The health benefits of an active lifestyle are well established but more research is required on the most effective interventions to increase activity in older adults. The 'West End Walkers 65+' randomised controlled trial aims to examine the feasibility of delivering a pedometer-based walking intervention to adults aged 65 years through a primary care setting and to determine the efficacy of this pilot. The study rationale, protocol and recruitment process are discussed in this paper.

METHODS/DESIGN: The intervention consisted of a 12-week pedometer-based graduated walking programme and physical activity consultations. Participants were randomised into an immediate intervention group (immediate group) or a 12-week waiting list control group (delayed group) who then received the intervention. For the pilot element of this study, the primary outcome measure was pedometer step counts. Secondary outcome measures of sedentary time and physical activity (time spent lying/sitting, standing or walking; activPAL™ monitor), mood (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), functional ability (Perceived Motor-Efficacy Scale for Older Adults), quality of life (Short-Form (36) Health Survey version 2) and loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) were assessed. Focus groups with participants and semi-structured interviews with the research team captured their experiences of the intervention. The feasibility component of this trial examined recruitment via primary care and retention of participants, appropriateness of the intervention for older adults and the delivery of the intervention by a practice nurse.

DISCUSSION

West End Walkers 65+ will determine the feasibility and pilot the efficacy of delivering a pedometer-based walking intervention through primary care to Scottish adults aged 65 years. The study will also examine the effect of the intervention on the well-being of participants and gain an insight into both participant and research team member experiences of the intervention.

摘要

背景

在苏格兰,由于很大比例的老年人不活跃,他们是身体活动干预的一个关键目标群体。积极生活方式的健康益处已得到充分证实,但需要更多研究来确定最有效的干预措施,以增加老年人的活动量。“西区步行者 65+”随机对照试验旨在检验通过初级保健环境向 65 岁以上成年人提供基于计步器的步行干预的可行性,并确定该试验的效果。本文讨论了研究的理由、方案和招募过程。

方法/设计:干预措施包括为期 12 周的基于计步器的分级步行计划和身体活动咨询。参与者被随机分为即时干预组(即时组)或 12 周候补名单对照组(延迟组),然后接受干预。对于本研究的试点部分,主要结果测量是计步器步数。次要结果测量包括久坐时间和身体活动(躺着/坐着、站立或行走的时间;activPAL™监测器)、情绪(积极和消极情绪量表)、功能能力(老年人感知运动效能量表)、生活质量(简短形式(36)健康调查版本 2)和孤独感(加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表)。与参与者进行焦点小组讨论,并对研究团队进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们对干预的体验。该试验的可行性部分评估了通过初级保健的招募和参与者的保留情况、干预措施对老年人的适宜性以及由执业护士提供干预措施的情况。

讨论

西区步行者 65+将确定通过初级保健向苏格兰 65 岁以上成年人提供基于计步器的步行干预的可行性和试点效果。该研究还将检查干预对参与者幸福感的影响,并深入了解参与者和研究团队成员对干预的体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4434/3050749/9268375c7ddd/1471-2458-11-120-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4434/3050749/9268375c7ddd/1471-2458-11-120-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4434/3050749/9268375c7ddd/1471-2458-11-120-1.jpg

相似文献

1
West End Walkers 65+: a randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based walking intervention for older adults: study rationale and design.西区步行者 65+:一项基于初级保健的针对老年人步行干预的随机对照试验:研究背景和设计。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 19;11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-120.
2
Increasing older adults' walking through primary care: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.通过初级保健增加老年人的步行量:一项试点随机对照试验的结果。
Fam Pract. 2012 Dec;29(6):633-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms038. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
3
The 'Walking for Wellbeing in the West' randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with physical activity consultation with 12 month follow-up: rationale and study design.“西方健康步行”随机对照试验:一项基于计步器的步行计划与体育活动咨询相结合并进行12个月随访的研究:原理与研究设计
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 26;8:259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-259.
4
A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT.基于计步器的 45 至 75 岁人群行走干预,有无执业护士支持:PACE-UP 三臂群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(37):1-274. doi: 10.3310/hta22370.
5
Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.一项由初级保健护士实施的复杂干预措施对 60-74 岁患者增加步行量的随机对照试验:PACE-Lift(计步器加速计咨询评估-电梯)试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 4;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-5.
6
A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial.一项由初级护理护士实施的针对老年人的步行干预措施:PACE(计步器加速计咨询评估)-Lift群组随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 17;12(2):e1001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783. eCollection 2015 Feb.
7
PACE-UP (Pedometer and consultation evaluation--UP)--a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45-75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.PACE-UP(计步器和咨询评估--UP)--一项基于计步器的步行干预措施,在 45-75 岁的初级保健患者中,有无执业护士支持:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:418. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-418.
8
A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial.基于计步器的步行干预,在普通实践中结合和不结合电子邮件咨询:一项先导随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 16;18(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5520-8.
9
Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial.一项针对45至75岁人群、有或无护士支持的初级保健步行干预对身体活动水平的影响:计步器与咨询评估(PACE-UP)整群随机临床试验
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 3;14(1):e1002210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
Process evaluation of the Walk Well study: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a community based walking programme for adults with intellectual disabilities.“行走有益”研究的过程评估:一项针对成年智障人士的社区步行计划的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 7;16:527. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3179-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of an Annual Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge on Changing Step Counts: Findings from Four Years of Delivery.年度全国职场计步挑战对改变计步数据的有效性:四年实施结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105140.
2
Longitudinal changes in physical function and physical activity in older adults.老年人身体功能和身体活动的纵向变化。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jul 1;47(4):558-564. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy025.
3
Age-related comparisons by sex in the domains of aerobic physical activity for adults in Scotland.

本文引用的文献

1
Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice.将医疗保健干预措施从试验转化为实际应用。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c3852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3852.
2
A process evaluation of a "physical activity pathway" in the primary care setting.初级保健环境中“身体活动途径”的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 9;10:463. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-463.
3
Stride rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking.步频推荐用于中等强度步行。
苏格兰成年人有氧体育活动领域按性别进行的年龄相关比较。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Dec 30;3:90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.12.013. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
PACE-UP (Pedometer and consultation evaluation--UP)--a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45-75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.PACE-UP(计步器和咨询评估--UP)--一项基于计步器的步行干预措施,在 45-75 岁的初级保健患者中,有无执业护士支持:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:418. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-418.
5
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.用于促进身体活动的远程及网络2.0干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 30;9(9):CD010395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010395.pub2.
6
Face-to-face versus remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.面对面干预与远程及网络2.0干预对促进身体活动的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 30;2013(9):CD010393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010393.pub2.
7
Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity.促进身体活动的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 30;2013(9):CD010392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010392.pub2.
8
Walk Well: a randomised controlled trial of a walking intervention for adults with intellectual disabilities: study protocol.行走有益:一项针对成年智障人士的行走干预随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 1;13:620. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-620.
9
Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysis.促进团体行走的干预措施是否能增加身体活动?一项荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Feb 6;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-18.
10
Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.一项由初级保健护士实施的复杂干预措施对 60-74 岁患者增加步行量的随机对照试验:PACE-Lift(计步器加速计咨询评估-电梯)试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 4;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-5.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):312-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e9d99a.
4
Analyzing free-living physical activity of older adults in different environments using body-worn activity monitors.使用穿戴式活动监测器分析老年人在不同环境中的自由生活身体活动。
J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr;18(2):171-84. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.2.171.
5
The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences.《促进健康的身体活动基础:英国运动与运动科学协会共识声明》。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Apr;28(6):573-91. doi: 10.1080/02640411003671212.
6
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
7
Adjusting step count recommendations for anthropometric variations in leg length.调整步计数建议以适应腿长的人体测量学变化。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Sep;13(5):509-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.11.002. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Effectiveness of a pragmatic education program designed to promote walking activity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial.一项旨在促进糖耐量受损个体步行活动的实用教育计划的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1404-10. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0130. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
9
Weight-management interventions in primary care: a pilot randomised controlled trial.初级保健中的体重管理干预措施:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e157-66. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420617.
10
Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.久坐时间与全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):998-1005. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355.