Suppr超能文献

四股交叉锁定的屈肌腱修复中锁定缝线尺寸的影响

Influence of locking stitch size in a four-strand cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

作者信息

Peltz Tim S, Haddad Roger, Scougall Peter J, Nicklin Sean, Gianoutsos Mark P, Walsh William R

机构信息

Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Mar;36(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The 4-strand cross-locked cruciate technique (Adelaide technique) for repairing flexor tendons in zone II is a favorable method in terms of strength and simplicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of varying the cross-lock stitch size in this repair technique. Outcomes measured were load to failure and gap formation.

METHODS

We harvested 22 deep flexor tendons from adult pig forelimbs and randomly allocated them into 2 groups. After cutting the tendons at a standard point, we performed a 4-strand cross-locked cruciate repair using 3-0 braided polyester with either 2-mm cross-locks (n = 11) or 4-mm cross-locks (n = 11). All repairs were completed with a simple running peripheral suture using 6-0 polypropylene. Repaired tendons were loaded to failure and the mechanism of failure, load to failure, stiffness, and load to 2-mm gap formation were determined.

RESULTS

All repairs failed by suture breakage; we noted no suture pullout. There was no difference in load to failure (71.7-71.1 N; p = .89) or stiffness (4.1-4.6 N/mm; p = .23) between the 2-mm cross-lock and the 4-mm cross-lock groups. There was a trend toward higher resistance to 2-mm gap formation with the 4-mm cross-locks (55-62.2 N; p = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

Four-strand cross-locked cruciate repairs with cross-lock sizes of 2 and 4 mm provide high tensile strength and are resistant to pullout. Repairs with 4-mm cross-locks tend to provide a more central load distribution and better gapping resistance than repairs with 2-mm cross-locks.

摘要

目的

用于修复Ⅱ区屈指肌腱的四股交叉锁定十字缝合法(阿德莱德缝合法)在强度和简便性方面是一种不错的方法。本研究的目的是探讨在这种修复技术中改变交叉锁定缝线尺寸的影响。测量的结果指标为断裂负荷和间隙形成情况。

方法

我们从成年猪前肢获取22条指深屈肌腱,并将它们随机分为2组。在标准点切断肌腱后,我们使用3-0编织聚酯线进行四股交叉锁定十字缝合法修复,交叉锁定尺寸为2毫米(n = 11)或4毫米(n = 11)。所有修复均使用6-0聚丙烯线进行简单的连续周边缝合完成。将修复后的肌腱加载至断裂,并确定断裂机制、断裂负荷、刚度以及形成2毫米间隙时的负荷。

结果

所有修复均因缝线断裂而失败;未观察到缝线拔出情况。2毫米交叉锁定组和4毫米交叉锁定组在断裂负荷(71.7 - 71.1牛;p = 0.89)或刚度(4.1 - 节4.6牛/毫米;p = 0.23)方面无差异。4毫米交叉锁定组在抵抗2毫米间隙形成方面有更高的趋势(55 - 62.2牛;p = 0.07)。

结论

交叉锁定尺寸为2毫米和4毫米的四股交叉锁定十字缝合法具有较高的抗张强度且抗拔出。与2毫米交叉锁定缝合法相比,4毫米交叉锁定缝合法往往能提供更集中的负荷分布和更好的抗间隙形成能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验