Friedlander L D, Munoz C A, Goodacre C J, Doyle M G, Moore B K
Indiana University School of Dentistry.
Int J Prosthodont. 1990 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-68.
Six maxillary first premolar all-ceramic tooth preparation designs were tested for their effect on the strength of Dicor crowns. Ten crowns were fabricated for each preparation design, and their breaking strengths were measured. Three finish line designs (1.2-mm shoulder with sharp axiogingival line angle, 1.2-mm shoulder with rounded axiogingival line angle, and 0.8-mm chamfer) and two total occlusal convergence angles (10 degrees and 20 degrees) were tested. All preparations possessed 2.0 mm of occlusal reduction. The average breaking strengths of the 10 Dicor crowns were compared to that of 10 metal ceramic control restorations. The tooth preparation with a 1.2-mm shoulder finish line, sharp axiogingival line angle, and 10 degrees of total occlusal convergence produced the strongest Dicor crowns (88.6 kg). The weakest restorations were observed when a 0.8-mm chamfer finish line (66.8 kg) was used. The metal ceramic restorations were significantly stronger (247.45 kg) than the strongest Dicor crowns (88.6 kg).
对六种上颌第一前磨牙全瓷牙体预备设计方案进行了测试,以研究其对Dicor全瓷冠强度的影响。每种预备设计方案制作了10个全瓷冠,并测量了它们的断裂强度。测试了三种肩台设计(1.2毫米带锐性轴龈线角的肩台、1.2毫米带圆钝轴龈线角的肩台和0.8毫米的斜面肩台)以及两种总咬合聚合角(10度和20度)。所有预备体均有2.0毫米的咬合面磨除量。将10个Dicor全瓷冠的平均断裂强度与10个金属烤瓷对照修复体的断裂强度进行比较。具有1.2毫米肩台边缘、锐性轴龈线角和10度总咬合聚合角的牙体预备方案制作出的Dicor全瓷冠强度最高(88.6千克)。使用0.8毫米斜面肩台边缘时观察到修复体强度最弱(66.8千克)。金属烤瓷修复体明显比最强的Dicor全瓷冠(88.6千克)更强(247.45千克)。