Dos Santos Maria de Fátima Oliveira, de França Genival Veloso
Universidade do Porto, Portugal.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):121-7. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70013-7.
There is a great lack of theoretical subsidies to guide ethical principles, specifically in the case of Anesthesiology. The objective of the present study was to analyze the bibliographic production regarding Bioethics in studies published by the Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology between 1999 and 2009.
Three studies published between 1999 and 2009 by the Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology were selected. Those studies covered bioethical issues in Anesthesiology or correlated anesthesia and Bioethics. A content analysis was used, according to the model of Bardin.
It was observed that Bioethical ideals were the most predominant issue, especially Principialism (f 23; 23.5%). On the other hand, the class that defines ethics as the cradle of Bioethics obtained the lowest amount of elementary context Units (CU) (f 15, 15.3%).
In the studies mentioned, Bioethics is considered an ideal to be achieved, facing difficulties to be applied in daily Anesthesia practice. The need of studies that focus on anesthesia and Bioethics more specifically, reflecting problems regarding both subjects, should be emphasized.
极度缺乏指导伦理原则的理论支持，尤其是在麻醉学领域。本研究的目的是分析1999年至2009年间巴西麻醉学杂志发表的关于生物伦理学研究的文献产出。
选取了巴西麻醉学杂志在1999年至2009年间发表的三项研究。这些研究涵盖了麻醉学中的生物伦理问题或关联麻醉与生物伦理学。根据巴尔丁模型进行内容分析。
观察到生物伦理理想是最主要的问题，尤其是原则主义（f 23；23.5%）。另一方面，将伦理学定义为生物伦理学摇篮的类别获得的基本语境单元（CU）数量最少（f 15，15.3%）。
在上述研究中，生物伦理学被视为一个有待实现的理想，在日常麻醉实践中应用面临困难。应强调需要更具体地关注麻醉与生物伦理学的研究，反映这两个主题的相关问题。
