Awad Imad T, Sinclair Colin, Chen Ewen W, McCartney Colin J L, Cheung Jeffrey J H, Dubrowski Adam
Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:36-8.
There is a recent shift from traditional nerve stimulation (NS) to ultrasound-guided (UG) techniques in regional anesthesia (RA). This shift prompted educators to readdress the best way to teach these two modalities. Development of a more structured curriculum requires an understanding of student preferences and perceptions. To help in structuring the teaching curriculum of RA, we examined residents' preferences to the methods of instruction (NS Vs. UG techniques). Novice residents (n=12) were enrolled in this parallel crossover trial. Two groups of 6 residents received a didactic lecture on NS or UG techniques. The groups then crossed over to view the other lecture. After they observed a demo of ISBPB on two patients using NS and US. The residents completed a questionnaire regarding their impression of each technique and the learning experience. UG technique was perceived to be safer and to have more educational value than NS. However, residents felt both techniques should be mandatory in the teaching curriculum.
在区域麻醉(RA)领域,最近出现了从传统神经刺激(NS)技术向超声引导(UG)技术的转变。这种转变促使教育工作者重新审视教授这两种方法的最佳方式。制定更具结构化的课程需要了解学生的偏好和认知。为了帮助构建区域麻醉的教学课程,我们研究了住院医师对教学方法(NS与UG技术)的偏好。12名新手住院医师参与了这项平行交叉试验。两组各6名住院医师分别接受了关于NS或UG技术的理论讲座。然后两组交叉观看另一讲座。在他们观看了使用NS和US对两名患者进行ISBPB的演示后,住院医师完成了一份关于他们对每种技术的印象和学习体验的问卷。与NS相比,UG技术被认为更安全且具有更高的教育价值。然而,住院医师认为这两种技术在教学课程中都应列为必修课。