Seybold Benjamin, Gaier Nils, Ofenloch Andreas, Boeckler Dittmar, Kalenka Armin, Fiedler-Kalenka Mascha O
Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Merck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 12;13(24):7557. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247557.
: There is an ongoing debate about the most advantageous anesthesia technique for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). From an anesthesiologic perspective, locoregional anesthesia (LRA) appears to offer significant benefits. However, the learning curve and complication rates for anesthesiologists newly performing ultrasound-guided LRA for CEA remain unclear and are to be examined in greater detail in this study. This retrospective, single-center study included all consecutive LRA administrations for CEA following the introduction of this procedure at a district hospital in Germany from November 2013 to November 2017. Nine board-certified anesthesiologists, initially inexperienced in LRA for CEA but with prior experience in other ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), received theoretical training and supervision during their first six combined deep and superficial cervical plexus blocks under ultrasound guidance. The primary endpoint was the incidence of insufficient block quality, indicated by pain and restlessness or the additional need for analgesics. Secondary endpoints included LRA-associated complications. Patients were divided into four groups based on the number of previously performed LRA procedures by the attending anesthesiologist. In 83 patients, LRA was performed by initially inexperienced anesthesiologists. Group A (patients managed by anesthesiologists performing their 1st to 3rd cervical plexus blockades) included 21 patients, Group B (blockades 4-6) included 12 patients, Group C (blockades 7-9) included 9 patients, and Group D (≥10 blockades) included 41 patients, respectively. The overall complication rate was 22% (18/83). Insufficient block quality occurred in 18.1% of patients (15/83), resulting in three conversions to general anesthesia (3.6%). Additional complications included dysphagia (n = 2) and Horner's syndrome (n = 1). The incidence of insufficient block quality was significantly reduced ( = 0.008) after performing the first three blockades. Ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block for CEA appears to be a rapidly learnable anesthesia technique for anesthesiologists experienced in other ultrasound-guided PNBs, with a low risk of complications. After three supervised blockades, the failure rate of LRA decreases significantly.
关于颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)最有利的麻醉技术一直存在争议。从麻醉学角度来看,局部区域麻醉(LRA)似乎有显著益处。然而,新开展超声引导下CEA的LRA的麻醉医生的学习曲线和并发症发生率仍不明确,本研究将对此进行更详细的探讨。这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2013年11月至2017年11月德国一家地区医院引入该手术后所有连续进行的CEA的LRA。九名获得委员会认证的麻醉医生,最初在CEA的LRA方面缺乏经验,但有其他超声引导下外周神经阻滞(PNB)的经验,在超声引导下进行前六次颈深丛和浅丛联合阻滞期间接受了理论培训和监督。主要终点是阻滞质量不足的发生率,表现为疼痛、躁动或额外需要镇痛药。次要终点包括与LRA相关的并发症。根据主治麻醉医生之前进行的LRA手术数量将患者分为四组。在83例患者中,LRA由最初缺乏经验的麻醉医生进行。A组(由进行第1至3次颈丛阻滞的麻醉医生管理的患者)包括21例患者,B组(阻滞4 - 6次)包括12例患者,C组(阻滞7 - 9次)包括9例患者,D组(≥10次阻滞)包括41例患者。总体并发症发生率为22%(18/83)。18.1%的患者(15/83)出现阻滞质量不足,导致3例转为全身麻醉(3.6%)。其他并发症包括吞咽困难(n = 2)和霍纳综合征(n = 1)。在前三次阻滞后,阻滞质量不足的发生率显著降低(= 0.008)。对于有其他超声引导下PNB经验的麻醉医生来说,超声引导下颈丛阻滞用于CEA似乎是一种可快速掌握的麻醉技术,并发症风险较低。经过三次监督下的阻滞后,LRA的失败率显著降低。