Kotalik Jaro
Department of Philosophy, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Dec;20(4):371-90.
The political and social principle of subsidiarity can be useful as a general principle of bioethics. The principle states that only those decisions and tasks that cannot be effectively decided upon or performed by a supported or subsidized lower level authority ought to be relegated to a more central or higher authority. The concept of subsidiarity has been embedded tacitly in Western political thought for two millennia, but it has been articulated expressly only in the twentieth century. The principle has unique strengths: it is the only principle that addresses the issue of locus of decision making; it is strongly linked to human dignity, democracy, and solidarity; and it can assist in reaching agreements on the common good. There are also potential drawbacks that need to be taken into account when developing rules and guidelines for the principle's application in bioethics. The principle is particularly helpful in public health ethics, but it is also of use in the ethics of personal care and human research ethics.
辅助性原则作为生物伦理学的一项一般性原则,在政治和社会层面可能会有所助益。该原则指出,只有那些受支持或资助的较低层级权威无法有效做出决策或执行的任务,才应交给更核心或更高层级的权威来处理。辅助性概念在西方政治思想中已潜移默化地存在了两千年,但直到二十世纪才得到明确阐述。该原则具有独特的优势:它是唯一涉及决策地点问题的原则;它与人类尊严、民主和团结紧密相连;并且有助于就共同利益达成共识。在制定该原则应用于生物伦理学的规则和指南时,也需要考虑到一些潜在的缺点。该原则在公共卫生伦理中特别有用,但在个人护理伦理和人体研究伦理中也有应用价值。