Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1011, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Mar 23;59(6):2202-12. doi: 10.1021/jf1043426. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
Endogenous shikimic acid determinations are routinely used to assess the efficacy of glyphosate in plants. Numerous analytical methods exist in the public domain for the detection of shikimic acid, yet the most commonly cited comprise spectrophotometric and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. This paper compares an HPLC and two spectrophotometric methods (Spec 1 and Spec 2) and assesses the effectiveness in the detection of shikimic acid in the tissues of glyphosate-treated plants. Furthermore, the study evaluates the versatility of two acid-based shikimic acid extraction methods and assesses the longevity of plant extract samples under different storage conditions. Finally, Spec 1 and Spec 2 are further characterized with respect to (1) the capacity to discern between shikimic acid and chemically related alicyclic hydroxy acids, (2) the stability of the chromophore (t1/2), (3) the detection limits, and (4) the cost and simplicity of undertaking the analytical procedure. Overall, spectrophotometric methods were more cost-effective and simpler to execute yet provided a narrower detection limit compared to HPLC. All three methods were specific to shikimic acid and detected the compound in the tissues of glyphosate-susceptible crops, increasing exponentially in concentration within 24 h of glyphosate application and plateauing at approximately 72 h. Spec 1 estimated more shikimic acid in identical plant extract samples compared to Spec 2 and, likewise, HPLC detection was more effective than spectrophotometric determinations. Given the unprecedented global adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant use of glyphosate, an effective and accurate assessment of glyphosate efficacy is important. Endogenous shikimic acid determinations are instrumental in corroborating the efficacy of glyphosate and therefore have numerous applications in herbicide research and related areas of science as well as resolving many commercial issues as a consequence of glyphosate utilization.
内源性莽草酸的测定通常用于评估植物中草甘膦的功效。公共领域存在许多用于检测莽草酸的分析方法,但最常被引用的方法包括分光光度法和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)。本文比较了 HPLC 和两种分光光度法(Spec 1 和 Spec 2),并评估了它们在检测草甘膦处理植物组织中莽草酸的有效性。此外,该研究评估了两种基于酸的莽草酸提取方法的多功能性,并评估了不同储存条件下植物提取物样品的稳定性。最后,Spec 1 和 Spec 2 进一步根据以下几个方面进行了特征描述:(1) 区分莽草酸和化学相关的脂环族羟基酸的能力,(2) 发色团的稳定性 (t1/2),(3) 检测限,以及 (4) 执行分析程序的成本和简单性。总体而言,分光光度法更具成本效益且执行起来更简单,但与 HPLC 相比,提供的检测限更窄。这三种方法都针对莽草酸,并且在草甘膦敏感作物的组织中检测到了该化合物,在草甘膦施用后 24 小时内浓度呈指数增长,72 小时后达到平台期。与 Spec 2 相比,Spec 1 估计相同植物提取物样品中的莽草酸含量更高,同样,HPLC 检测比分光光度法更有效。考虑到草甘膦抗性作物的全球空前采用以及草甘膦的伴随使用,对草甘膦功效进行有效和准确的评估非常重要。内源性莽草酸的测定对于佐证草甘膦的功效至关重要,因此在除草剂研究和相关科学领域以及解决许多因草甘膦使用而产生的商业问题方面具有广泛的应用。