Suppr超能文献

接种两种灭活流感疫苗后出现发热——对新西兰 5 岁及以下婴幼儿家长的调查。

Fever following administration of two inactivated influenza vaccines--a survey of parents of New Zealand infants and children 5 years of age and under.

机构信息

Immunisation Advisory Centre, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2011 Apr 5;29(16):2933-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Due to a dramatic increase in reported febrile convulsions in Western Australia following a routine pediatric influenza vaccination programme we evaluated parental recall of fever in their child following 2010 trivalent influenza vaccine manufactured by either Sanofi Pasteur (Vaxigrip(®)) or CSL Biotherapies (Fluvax(®)) to determine if the rates of febrile events in infants and children 5 years and under following administration of either Vaxigrip(®) or Fluvax(®) were significantly different.

METHOD

A convenience sample of New Zealand General practices who had received stocks of the vaccines of interest consecutively contacted parents of infants and children under 5 years of age who received at least one dose of 2010 influenza vaccine. A brief questionnaire was administered with the main outcome parental recall of fever within 24 h of vaccination.

RESULTS

Response rate was 99%. There were 327 parents of children aged 6 months to 5 years attending one of 23 primary care practices who had received a dose of either the Vaxigrip(®) or Fluvax(®) vaccine between 4th March and 28th June 2010 surveyed. A total of 422 doses were given of which 267 were Vaxigrip(®), 133 were Fluvax(®) and 22 another vaccine. Fever occurred significantly more frequently within 24 h following administration of Fluvax(®) compared with Vaxigrip(®) RR 4.33 (2.44-7.70). When fevers were measured they were, on average, higher in the Fluvax(®) vaccines (38°C compared with 39°C). Additionally, recipients were more likely to seek medical advice for fever following Fluvax(®) RR 23.11 (2.96-180.12).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in reactogenicity between two 2010 seasonal vaccines in infants and young children. Vaxigrip(®) is significantly less reactogenic when compared to Fluvax(®) in this population in which Fluvax(®) is associated with unacceptably high rates of febrile reactions. There has been insufficient safety evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine safety in this population.

摘要

未加标签

由于西澳大利亚州在常规小儿流感疫苗接种计划后报告热性惊厥急剧增加,我们评估了父母在其孩子接种由赛诺菲巴斯德(Vaxigrip®)或 CSL 生物治疗公司(Fluvax®)生产的 2010 年三价流感疫苗后的发烧情况。为了确定在接受 Vaxigrip®或 Fluvax®接种后,5 岁以下婴儿和儿童的发热事件发生率是否存在显著差异。

方法

对新西兰普通诊所进行了便利抽样,这些诊所连续收到了感兴趣的疫苗库存,并联系了至少接受一剂 2010 年流感疫苗的 5 岁以下婴儿和儿童的父母。对他们进行了简短的问卷调查,主要结果是父母回忆接种后 24 小时内的发烧情况。

结果

应答率为 99%。在 23 家初级保健诊所中,有 327 名年龄在 6 个月至 5 岁的儿童的父母接受了调查,这些儿童在 2010 年 3 月 4 日至 6 月 28 日期间接种了一剂 Vaxigrip®或 Fluvax®疫苗。共接种了 422 剂疫苗,其中 267 剂为 Vaxigrip®,133 剂为 Fluvax®,22 剂为其他疫苗。与 Vaxigrip®相比,Fluvax®接种后 24 小时内发热的频率明显更高,RR 为 4.33(2.44-7.70)。当测量体温时,Fluvax®疫苗的平均体温更高(38°C 与 39°C)。此外,Fluvax®接种后,接受者更有可能因发热而寻求医疗建议,RR 为 23.11(2.96-180.12)。

结论

在婴幼儿中,两种 2010 年季节性疫苗的反应原性存在显著差异。与 Fluvax®相比,Vaxigrip®在该人群中的反应原性明显较低,而 Fluvax®与发热反应的发生率过高有关。在该人群中,季节性流感疫苗的安全性评估不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验