Université Lille1 (Sciences et Technologies), Laboratoire PhLAM, CNRS UMR 8523, Bât P5, F-59655, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Dalton Trans. 2011 Apr 7;40(13):3154-65. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01490g. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
Possible mechanisms for intermolecular exchange between coordinated and solvent water in the complexes Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(2) and Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(OH(2)) and intermolecular exchange between free and coordinated HTTA in Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(HTTA) and Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(HTTA) have been investigated using ab initio quantum chemical methods. The calculations comprise both structures and energies of isomers, intermediates and transition states. Based on these data and experimental NMR data (Part 2) we have suggested intimate reaction mechanisms for water exchange, intramolecular exchange between structure isomers and intermolecular exchange between free HTTA and coordinated TTA. A large number of isomers are possible for the complexes investigated, but only some of them have been investigated, in all of them the most stable geometry is a more or less distorted square anti-prism or bicapped trigonal prism; the energy differences between the various isomers are in general small, less than 10 kJ mol(-1). 9-coordinated intermediates play an important role in all reactions. Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(3) has three non-equivalent water ligands that can participate in ligand exchange reactions. The fastest of these exchanging sites has a QM activation energy of 18.1 kJ mol(-1), in good agreement with the experimental activation enthalpy of 19.6 kJ mol(-1). The mechanism for the intramolecular exchange between structure isomers in Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(2) involves the opening of a TTA-ring as the rate determining step as suggested by the good agreement between the QM activation energy and the experimental activation enthalpy 47.8 and 58.3 J mol(-1), respectively. The mechanism for the intermolecular exchange between free and coordinated HTTA in Y(TTA)(3)(HTTA) and Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(HTTA) involves the opening of the intramolecular hydrogen bond in coordinated HTTA followed by proton transfer to coordinated TTA. This mechanism is supported by the good agreement between experimental activation enthalpies (within parenthesis) and calculated activation energies 68.7 (71.8) and 35.3 (38.8) kJ mol(-1). The main reason for the difference between the two systems is the much lower energy required to open the intramolecular hydrogen bond in the latter. The accuracy of the QM methods and chemical models used is discussed.
使用从头算量子化学方法研究了配合物 Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(2) 和 Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(OH(2)) 中配位水和溶剂水之间的分子间交换以及 Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(HTTA) 和 Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(HTTA) 中游离 HTTA 和配位 TTA 之间的分子间交换的可能机制。计算包括异构体、中间体和过渡态的结构和能量。基于这些数据和实验 NMR 数据(第 2 部分),我们提出了水交换、结构异构体之间的分子内交换和游离 HTTA 与配位 TTA 之间的分子间交换的详细反应机制。对于所研究的配合物,可能存在大量的异构体,但只研究了其中的一些,它们中最稳定的几何形状是或多或少扭曲的四方反棱柱体或双帽三角棱柱体;各种异构体之间的能量差异通常较小,小于 10 kJ mol(-1)。9 配位中间体在所有反应中都起着重要作用。Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(3) 有三个非等价的水配体,可以参与配体交换反应。这些交换位点中最快的一个具有 18.1 kJ mol(-1)的 QM 活化能,与实验活化焓 19.6 kJ mol(-1)非常吻合。Y(TTA)(3)(OH(2))(2) 中结构异构体之间的分子内交换机制涉及 TTA-环的打开,这是速率决定步骤,这与 QM 活化能和实验活化焓之间的良好一致性相吻合,分别为 47.8 和 58.3 J mol(-1)。Y(TTA)(3)(HTTA) 和 Y(TTA)(3)(TBP)(HTTA) 中游离 HTTA 和配位 HTTA 之间的分子间交换机制涉及配位 HTTA 中分子内氢键的打开,随后质子转移到配位 TTA。这种机制得到了实验活化焓(括号内)和计算活化能 68.7(71.8)和 35.3(38.8)kJ mol(-1)之间良好一致性的支持。两个系统之间差异的主要原因是后者打开分子内氢键所需的能量要低得多。讨论了所使用的 QM 方法和化学模型的准确性。