• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钛弹性钉与髋人字石膏固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折。

Titanium elastic nailing versus hip spica cast in treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children.

机构信息

Medical Students Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):45-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0128-0. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10195-011-0128-0
PMID:21340544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3052430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on treatment of closed femoral-shaft fractures in children. We compared hip spica cast with titanium elastic nailing (TEN) in the treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six children, 6-12 years old, with simple femoral-shaft fractures were randomized to receive skeletal traction followed by hip spica cast (n = 23) or TEN (n = 23). Length of hospital stay, time to start walking with aids, time to start independent walking, time absent from school, parent satisfaction, and range of knee motion were compared between the two groups 6 months after injury.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in background characteristics. Compared with the children treated with spica cast, those treated with TEN had shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001) and took a shorter time to start walking with support or independently (P < 0.001), returned to school sooner (P < 0.001), and had higher parent satisfaction (P = 0.003). Range of knee motion was 138.7 ± 3.4° in the spica cast group and 133.5 ± 13.4° in the TEN group (P = 0.078). Three patients (13.0%) in the spica cast group compared with none in the TEN group had malunion (P = 0.117). Postoperative infection was observed in three patients (13.0%) in the TEN group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed significant benefits of TEN compared with traction and hip spica cast in the treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children. Further trials with longer follow-ups and comparison of TEN with other methods, such as external fixation, in children's femoral fractures are warranted.

摘要

背景

儿童闭合性股骨干骨折的治疗尚无共识。我们比较了儿童股骨干骨折的髋人字石膏固定与钛弹性钉(TEN)固定的疗效。

材料和方法

46 名 6-12 岁的单纯股骨干骨折患儿随机分为接受骨牵引后髋人字石膏固定(n = 23)或 TEN 固定(n = 23)。比较两组患儿的住院时间、辅助行走开始时间、独立行走开始时间、缺课时间、家长满意度以及膝关节活动范围。

结果

两组患儿的背景特征相似。与接受人字石膏固定的患儿相比,接受 TEN 固定的患儿住院时间更短(P < 0.001),辅助行走或独立行走开始时间更早(P < 0.001),上学时间更早(P < 0.001),家长满意度更高(P = 0.003)。人字石膏固定组的膝关节活动范围为 138.7 ± 3.4°,TEN 固定组为 133.5 ± 13.4°(P = 0.078)。人字石膏固定组有 3 例(13.0%)患儿发生畸形愈合,TEN 固定组无患儿发生畸形愈合(P = 0.117)。TEN 固定组有 3 例(13.0%)患儿术后发生感染。

结论

与牵引和髋人字石膏固定相比,TEN 治疗儿童股骨干骨折具有明显优势。需要进行更长时间随访的进一步试验,并比较 TEN 与儿童股骨干骨折其他治疗方法(如外固定)的疗效。

相似文献

1
Titanium elastic nailing versus hip spica cast in treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children.钛弹性钉与髋人字石膏固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):45-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0128-0. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
2
Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and a spica cast to treat femoral fractures in children.钛弹性髓内钉与牵引及髋人字石膏治疗儿童股骨骨折的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):770-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00015.
3
Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and spica cast in treatment of children's femoral shaft fractures.钛弹性髓内钉与牵引及石膏固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的比较
Pak J Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 15;16(8):391-5. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.391.395.
4
Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年股骨干骨折的治疗干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):753-826. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1987.
5
Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents.治疗儿童和青少年股骨干骨折的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;2014(7):CD009076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009076.pub2.
6
The treatment of low-energy femoral shaft fractures: a prospective study comparing the "walking spica" with the traditional spica cast.低能股骨骨干骨折的治疗:比较“行走斯皮扎”与传统斯皮扎石膏的前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2196-202. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01165.
7
Less malunion and shorter bone union time with titanium elastic nail treatment for isolated femoral shaft fractures in three- to six-year-old children.儿童 3 岁至 6 岁股骨干骨折采用钛弹性钉治疗后愈合不良和骨愈合时间更短。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):893-898. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03223-0. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
Which treatment option for paediatric femoral fractures in school-aged children: elastic nail or spica casting?学龄期儿童股骨骨折的治疗选择:弹性髓内钉还是髋人字石膏固定?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 May;24(4):593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1234-x. Epub 2013 May 21.
9
Intramedullary Nailing Compared with Spica Casts for Isolated Femoral Fractures in Four and Five-Year-Old Children.儿童 4 至 5 岁时发生的单纯股骨干骨折:髓内钉与管型石膏固定的疗效比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Feb 17;98(4):267-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00706.
10
[Treatment of diaphyseal femoral fractures in children: a clinical study].[儿童股骨干骨折的治疗:一项临床研究]
Ann Chir. 1999;53(8):728-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice Pattern Preferences Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons in North America for the Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures.北美小儿骨科医生治疗股骨干骨折的实践模式偏好
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 26;12:100211. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100211. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Titanium Elastic Nailing Versus Hip Spica Cast in the Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children.钛弹性髓内钉与髋人字石膏治疗儿童股骨干骨折的比较
Cureus. 2025 May 10;17(5):e83868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83868. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Titanium Elastic Nail Fixation Versus Spica Cast Application for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures in Children Under Five Years Old: A Retrospective Study.钛弹性髓内钉固定与髋人字石膏固定治疗五岁以下儿童股骨干骨折的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 14;17(1):e77422. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77422. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Flexible nailing: Pushing the indications for diametaphyseal lower-extremity fractures.弹性固定:拓宽骨干骨折的适应证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 15;103(11):e37417. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037417.
5
Efficacy of Single Titanium Elastic Nail in the Treatment of Child Femur Fractures.单根钛弹性髓内钉治疗儿童股骨骨折的疗效
Cureus. 2023 Sep 27;15(9):e46099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46099. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Therapy preference of 131 parents confronted with a pediatric femoral fracture.131名面临小儿股骨骨折的家长的治疗偏好
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 15;10:949019. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.949019. eCollection 2022.
7
Complication of Early Application of One and a Half Hip Spica for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children below Six Years in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.三级医院 6 岁以下儿童股骨干骨折早期应用 1.5 髋人字石膏并发症:描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Oct 15;59(242):1035-1039. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6779.
8
Treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2-10 岁儿童闭合股骨干骨折的治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3409-3427. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01752-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC FEMORAL FRACTURES IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB.萨格勒布市小儿股骨干骨折的治疗。
Acta Clin Croat. 2020 Dec;59(4):686-695. doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.04.15.
10
Can Paediatric Femoral Fracture Hip Spica Application be Done in the Outpatient Setting?小儿股骨干骨折应用髋人字石膏能在门诊进行吗?
Malays Orthop J. 2021 Mar;15(1):105-112. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2103.016.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of femoral fractures in children: is titanium elastic nailing an improvement over hip spica casting?儿童股骨骨折的治疗:钛弹性髓内钉相较于髋人字石膏固定是否有所改进?
J Child Orthop. 2010 Jun;4(3):245-51. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0252-z. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
2
Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and a spica cast to treat femoral fractures in children.钛弹性髓内钉与牵引及髋人字石膏治疗儿童股骨骨折的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):770-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00015.
3
Femoral shaft fractures in children: traction and casting versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing.儿童股骨干骨折:牵引与石膏固定对比弹性稳定髓内钉固定
J Trauma. 2002 Nov;53(5):914-21. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200211000-00017.
4
Social and economic benefits of flexible intramedullary nails in the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.弹性髓内钉治疗小儿股骨干骨折的社会和经济效益。
Orthopedics. 2002 Oct;25(10):1067-70; discussion 1070. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20021001-18.
5
The treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children: a systematic overview and critical appraisal of the literature.儿童股骨干骨折的治疗:文献的系统综述与批判性评价
Can J Surg. 2000 Jun;43(3):180-9.
6
Fractures of the femoral shaft in children. Incidence, mechanisms, and sociodemographic risk factors.儿童股骨干骨折。发病率、机制及社会人口学危险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):500-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00007.
7
One hundred pediatric femoral fractures: epidemiology, treatment attitudes, and early complications.100例儿童股骨骨折:流行病学、治疗态度及早期并发症
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998 Jul;7(3):186-92. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199807000-00002.
8
Economic evaluation of 2 treatments for pediatric femoral shaft fractures.两种小儿股骨干骨折治疗方法的经济学评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Mar(336):205-15. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199703000-00029.
9
Femoral shaft fractures in adolescents: a comparison between traction plus cast treatment and closed intramedullary nailing.青少年股骨干骨折:牵引加石膏治疗与闭合髓内钉固定的比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 1981;1(2):193-7.
10
[Closed flexible medullary nailing in pediatric traumatology].[小儿创伤学中的闭合性弹性髓内钉固定术]
Chir Pediatr. 1983;24(6):383-5.