Say Ferhat, Gürler Deniz, Inkaya Erkan, Yener Kamil, Bülbül Murat
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Kurupelit, 55139, Samsun, Turkey,
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 May;24(4):593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1234-x. Epub 2013 May 21.
Titanium elastic nails and immediate spica casts are treatment options for femoral fractures in school-aged children (6-12 years). This study aimed to compare the results of elastic nail and immediate spica cast methods for treating femoral fractures in school-aged children.
A retrospective evaluation was made of patients who underwent immediate spica cast (20 patients) or titanium elastic nail (22 patients) for femoral fracture. Groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic union, duration of hospitalisation, range of knee motion, walking independently and complications. The mean age was 9.8 ± 1.3 years for the elastic nail group and 6.4 ± 1 for the cast group. The mean follow-up period was 12.6 ± 5.2 months for the elastic nail group and 14.3 ± 6 months for the cast group.
All fractures in both group were healed. Duration of hospitalisation was shorter (2.2/7.1) and range of knee motion was better (132°/129°) in the cast group. The duration for independent walking was shorter (49.2/79.8) in the nail group. These differences were significant (p < 0.001). Two superficial infections and two malalignment were detected in the nail group. Three superficial infections and four malalignment were detected in the cast group.
We detected that both treatment options were similar with regard to complications and results. Although the complications are similar in two treatment methods, complications of elastic nail are more challenging and may require new surgical procedure. If the elastic nail is selected, surgical complications should not be underestimated.
钛弹性髓内钉和髋人字石膏固定是学龄儿童(6 - 12岁)股骨干骨折的治疗选择。本研究旨在比较弹性髓内钉和髋人字石膏固定治疗学龄儿童股骨干骨折的效果。
对接受髋人字石膏固定(20例)或钛弹性髓内钉治疗(22例)的股骨干骨折患者进行回顾性评估。比较两组在临床和影像学愈合情况、住院时间、膝关节活动范围、独立行走情况及并发症方面的差异。弹性髓内钉组平均年龄为9.8±1.3岁,石膏固定组平均年龄为6.4±1岁。弹性髓内钉组平均随访时间为12.6±5.2个月,石膏固定组平均随访时间为14.3±6个月。
两组所有骨折均愈合。石膏固定组住院时间较短(2.2/7.1天),膝关节活动范围较好(132°/129°)。髓内钉组独立行走时间较短(49.2/79.8天)。这些差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。髓内钉组发现2例浅表感染和2例对线不良。石膏固定组发现3例浅表感染和4例对线不良。
我们发现两种治疗方法在并发症和治疗效果方面相似。虽然两种治疗方法的并发症相似,但弹性髓内钉的并发症更具挑战性,可能需要新的手术操作。如果选择弹性髓内钉,不应低估手术并发症。