• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施结肠癌和直肠癌根治性切除术国家治疗策略的生存效果。

Survival effect of implementing national treatment strategies for curatively resected colonic and rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):716-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7426. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.7426
PMID:21341253
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of rectal cancer has changed substantially over the past decade. There are limited data on the long-term outcome of implementing systematic management strategies.

METHODS

Survival of a national cohort of patients treated surgically for colonic and rectal cancer over a 10-year interval was analysed. All 31 158 patients in Norway diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum between 1994 and 2003 were identified from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. Changes in 5-year relative survival were compared by age, stage and tumour location during the early and late years.

RESULTS

The study population included 19 053 patients who had a curative resection. The relative 5-year survival rate significantly improved for both colonic cancer (73·8 versus 78·0 per cent; P < 0·001) and rectal cancer (72·1 versus 79·6 per cent; P < 0·001). The 5-year relative survival was significantly better for rectal than colonic cancer during the late period (P = 0·030). Improved 5-year relative survival was related to better outcomes in patients with positive lymph nodes (67·2 and 62·1 per cent for rectal and colonic cancer respectively; each P < 0·001 versus early period), but not for the subgroup aged over 75 years with lymph node-positive colonic cancer.

CONCLUSION

In this national cohort, survival after curative surgery for colorectal cancer increased significantly after implementation of national management strategies. Improvements were most evident for rectal cancer and in lymph node-positive disease; they were less substantial for colonic cancer and elderly patients (over 75 years). Strategic treatment changes may be warranted for the latter group.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,直肠癌的外科治疗发生了重大变化。关于实施系统管理策略的长期结果的数据有限。

方法

分析了在 10 年期间接受手术治疗的结肠和直肠癌患者的全国队列的生存情况。从挪威癌症登记处和挪威直肠登记处确定了 1994 年至 2003 年间诊断为结肠和直肠腺癌的 31158 名挪威患者。通过年龄、分期和肿瘤位置比较早期和晚期 5 年相对生存率的变化。

结果

研究人群包括 19053 名接受根治性切除术的患者。结肠癌(73.8%比 78.0%;P < 0.001)和直肠癌(72.1%比 79.6%;P < 0.001)的 5 年相对生存率均显著提高。晚期直肠癌的 5 年相对生存率明显优于结肠癌(P = 0.030)。5 年相对生存率的改善与阳性淋巴结患者的更好结果相关(直肠癌和结肠癌分别为 67.2%和 62.1%;P < 0.001),但对于年龄在 75 岁以上且淋巴结阳性的结肠癌患者则不然。

结论

在这项全国性队列研究中,在实施国家管理策略后,结直肠癌根治性手术后的生存显著提高。直肠癌和阳性淋巴结疾病的改善最为明显;结肠癌和老年患者(75 岁以上)的改善幅度较小。对于后者,可能需要进行策略性治疗改变。

相似文献

1
Survival effect of implementing national treatment strategies for curatively resected colonic and rectal cancer.实施结肠癌和直肠癌根治性切除术国家治疗策略的生存效果。
Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):716-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7426. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
2
Quality assurance in rectal cancer treatment in the Netherlands: a catch up compared to colon cancer treatment.荷兰直肠癌治疗中的质量保证:与结肠癌治疗相比的追赶。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;36(4):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
3
Excess mortality after curative surgery for colorectal cancer changes over time and differs for patients with colon versus rectal cancer.结直肠癌根治性手术后的超额死亡率随时间而变化,且结肠癌与直肠癌患者的死亡率不同。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):933-40. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.731522. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
4
Surgical treatment and late results in 1,226 colorectal cancer cases.1226例结直肠癌病例的手术治疗及远期疗效
Chin Med J (Engl). 1982 Jul;95(7):483-90.
5
Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected colorectal carcinoma. The Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group of Japan.根治性切除结直肠癌辅助化疗的随机对照试验五年结果。日本结直肠癌化疗研究组。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jun;25(3):91-103.
6
[Which recommendations for surveillance of patients after colonic or rectal tumor surgery?].对于结肠或直肠肿瘤手术后患者的监测,有哪些建议?
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998 Nov;22(11):981-3.
7
Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in colorectal cancer (AXIS).结直肠癌辅助放疗与5-氟尿嘧啶输注的随机临床试验(AXIS)
Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1200-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4266.
8
[Surgical treatment of colonic and rectal cancer].[结肠直肠癌的外科治疗]
Duodecim. 1985;101(18):1782-7.
9
Therapeutic delay reduces survival of rectal cancer but not of colonic cancer.治疗延迟会降低直肠癌患者的生存率,但不会降低结肠癌患者的生存率。
Br J Surg. 2009 Oct;96(10):1183-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6700.
10
Limited survival in the treatment of carcinomatosis from rectal cancer.直肠癌种植转移的治疗中生存期有限。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Dec;48(12):2258-63. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0189-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Congestive heart failure and comorbidity as determinants of colorectal cancer perioperative outcomes.充血性心力衰竭和合并症作为结直肠癌围手术期结局的决定因素。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01086-4. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review.年龄差异对结肠癌和肺癌生存影响的模式:系统叙述性文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 10;11(3):e044239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044239.
3
A template to quantify the location and density of CD3 + and CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colon cancer by digital pathology on whole slides for an objective, standardized immune score assessment.
一种通过全玻片数字病理学对结肠癌中CD3 +和CD8 +肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的位置和密度进行量化的模板,用于客观、标准化的免疫评分评估。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021 Jul;70(7):2049-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02834-y. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Overall treatment outcome - analysis of long-term results of rectal cancer treatment on the basis of a new parameter.总体治疗结果——基于新参数对直肠癌治疗长期结果的分析。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Apr 8;16(4):825-833. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94330. eCollection 2020.
5
Treatment and Survival of Patients with Colon Cancer Aged 80 Years and Older: A EURECCA International Comparison.80 岁及以上老年结肠癌患者的治疗与生存:EURECCA 的国际比较。
Oncologist. 2018 Aug;23(8):982-990. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0551. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Can molecular biomarkers replace a clinical risk score for resectable colorectal liver metastasis?分子生物标志物能否取代可切除结直肠癌肝转移的临床风险评分?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Mar 15;9(3):98-104. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i3.98.
7
Short-term outcome in patients treated with cytoreduction and HIPEC compared to conventional colon cancer surgery.与传统结肠癌手术相比,接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)治疗的患者的短期预后。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5111. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005111.
8
Assessment of clinically related outcomes and biomarker analysis for translational integration in colorectal cancer (ACROBATICC): study protocol for a population-based, consecutive cohort of surgically treated colorectal cancers and resected colorectal liver metastasis.结直肠癌转化整合的临床相关结局评估与生物标志物分析(ACROBATICC):一项基于人群的连续队列研究方案,纳入接受手术治疗的结直肠癌和切除的结直肠肝转移患者
J Transl Med. 2016 Jun 29;14(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0951-4.
9
The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.阳性淋巴结的对数比值对Ⅲ期直肠癌患者中的高危个体进行分层并预测其生存情况。
Oncologist. 2016 Apr;21(4):425-32. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0441. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Evaluation of parametric models by the prediction error in colorectal cancer survival analysis.通过预测误差对结直肠癌生存分析中的参数模型进行评估。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015 Summer;8(3):183-7.