Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Surgical Cancer Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 10;11(3):e044239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044239.
To identify patterns of age disparities in cancer survival, using colon and lung cancer as exemplars.
Systematic review of the literature.
We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science through 18 December 2020.
We retained all original articles published in English including patients with colon or lung cancer. Eligible studies were required to be population-based, report survival across several age groups (of which at least one was over the age of 65) and at least one other characteristic (eg, sex, treatment).
Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies against selected evaluation domains from the QUIPS tool, and items concerning statistical reporting. We evaluated age disparities using the absolute difference in survival or mortality rates between the middle-aged group and the oldest age group, or by describing survival curves.
Out of 3047 references, we retained 59 studies (20 for colon, 34 for lung and 5 for both sites). Regardless of the cancer site, the included studies were highly heterogeneous and often of poor quality. The magnitude of age disparities in survival varied greatly by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, cancer site, and morphology, the number of nodes examined and treatment strategy. Although results were inconsistent for most characteristics, we consistently observed greater age disparities for women with lung cancer compared with men. Also, age disparities increased with more advanced stages for colon cancer and decreased with more advanced stages for lung cancer.
Although age is one of the most important prognostic factors in cancer survival, age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival have so far been understudied in population-based research. Further studies are needed to better understand age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival.
CRD42020151402.
以结肠癌和肺癌为例,确定癌症生存中年龄差异的模式。
文献系统综述。
我们于 2020 年 12 月 18 日在 Embase、MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中检索了文献。
保留所有发表于英文文献中的原始文章,包括结肠癌或肺癌患者。合格的研究必须是基于人群的,报告了几个年龄组的生存情况(其中至少有一个年龄组超过 65 岁),并且报告了至少另一个特征(例如,性别、治疗)。
两位独立的审查员提取数据,并根据 QUIPS 工具中的选定评估领域和有关统计报告的项目评估纳入研究的质量。我们通过比较中年组和最老年组之间的生存或死亡率的绝对差异,或通过描述生存曲线,来评估生存差异。
在 3047 篇参考文献中,我们保留了 59 项研究(20 项结肠癌,34 项肺癌,5 项两者都有)。无论癌症部位如何,纳入的研究高度异质,且质量往往较差。生存差异的幅度因性别、种族、社会经济地位、诊断时的分期、癌症部位和形态、检查的淋巴结数量以及治疗策略而有很大差异。尽管大多数特征的结果不一致,但我们一致观察到肺癌女性的年龄差异大于男性。此外,结肠癌的分期越晚,年龄差异越大,而肺癌的分期越晚,年龄差异越小。
尽管年龄是癌症生存的最重要预后因素之一,但迄今为止,基于人群的研究对结肠癌和肺癌生存中的年龄差异研究不足。需要进一步研究以更好地理解结肠癌和肺癌生存中的年龄差异。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020151402。