• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对西班牙检验医学学会(SEQC)外部质量保证分析前程序的18项质量指标进行评估。

Evaluation of 18 quality indicators from the external quality assurance preanalytical programme of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC).

作者信息

Caballero Andrea, Gómez-Rioja Rubén, Ventura Montserrat, Llopis María Antonia, Bauça Josep Miquel, Gómez-Gómez Carolina, Marzana Itziar, Ibarz Mercedes

机构信息

Extra-analytical Quality Commission of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML). Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Echevarne Laboratory, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain.

Extra-analytical Quality Commission of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML). Servicio de Análisis Clínicos. Hospital La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Adv Lab Med. 2022 May 18;3(2):175-200. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0097. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1515/almed-2021-0097
PMID:37361871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10197339/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most errors in laboratory medicine occur in the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process (TTP). In 2014, the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC) started the current Preanalytical Phase EQA Programme, with the objective of providing a tool for the improvement of the preanalytical phase. The aim of this study was to review the evolution of quality indicators (QI) and the comparability of established performance specifications (PS) with other EQA programmes.

METHODS

In the SEQC programme, participants were asked to register rejections of the main specimens and the causes for rejections. Data collected from 2014 to 2017, and then reviewed biennially (2018-2019), was used to calculate the percentiles; p25, p50, p75, and p90 for every round, and their means were set as PS. These PS were compared with the results of other programmes.

RESULTS

The evolution of QI results for 2018-2019 period showed general maintenance or improvement, e.g., a significant decrease in the number of serum samples with a haemolytic index ≥0.5 g/L, except for EDTA and citrate samples handle, maybe for an improvement in detection. The comparison with PS for the QI of the IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" and the Key Incident Management and Monitoring System (KIMMS) programme of the RCPA showed comparable results, supporting the validity of the established specifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS obtained are a helpful tool for benchmarking and to identify processes of the preanalytical phase whose improvement should be set as a priority.

摘要

目的

检验医学中的大多数错误发生在总检验流程(TTP)的分析前和分析后阶段。2014年,西班牙检验医学学会(SEQC)启动了当前的分析前阶段室间质量评价计划,目的是提供一个改善分析前阶段的工具。本研究的目的是回顾质量指标(QI)的演变以及既定性能规范(PS)与其他室间质量评价计划的可比性。

方法

在SEQC计划中,要求参与者记录主要标本的拒收情况及拒收原因。收集2014年至2017年的数据,然后每两年(2018 - 2019年)进行一次回顾,用于计算各轮的第25百分位数、第50百分位数、第75百分位数和第90百分位数,并将其平均值设为PS。将这些PS与其他计划的结果进行比较。

结果

2018 - 2019年期间QI结果的演变显示总体保持或有所改善,例如,溶血指数≥0.5 g/L的血清样本数量显著减少,但乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和枸橼酸盐样本处理情况除外,这可能是检测方面有所改善的结果。与国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)“实验室错误与患者安全”工作组的QI的PS以及皇家澳大利亚病理学家学院(RCPA)的关键事件管理与监测系统(KIMMS)计划进行比较,结果具有可比性,支持了既定规范的有效性。

结论

获得的PS是一个有助于进行基准比较和识别分析前阶段应优先改进流程的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/0c542dd38bd9/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/0d88c9d6de80/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/7c82c8b96954/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/0c542dd38bd9/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/0d88c9d6de80/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/7c82c8b96954/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/10197339/0c542dd38bd9/j_almed-2021-0097_fig_003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of 18 quality indicators from the external quality assurance preanalytical programme of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC).对西班牙检验医学学会(SEQC)外部质量保证分析前程序的18项质量指标进行评估。
Adv Lab Med. 2022 May 18;3(2):175-200. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0097. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Spanish society of laboratory medicine external quality assurance programmes: evolution of the analytical performance of clinical laboratories over 30 years and comparison with other programmes.西班牙检验医学学会外部质量保证计划:临床实验室30年分析性能的演变及与其他计划的比较。
Adv Lab Med. 2020 May 19;1(2):20200019. doi: 10.1515/almed-2020-0019. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Spanish Preanalytical Quality Monitoring Program (SEQC), an overview of 12 years' experience.西班牙分析前质量监测计划(SEQC):12年经验概述
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(4):530-538. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0382.
4
Evaluation of preanalytical and postanalytical phases in clinical biochemistry laboratory according to IFCC laboratory errors and patient safety specifications.根据国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)实验室误差和患者安全规范评估临床生物化学实验室的分析前和分析后阶段。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Oct 1;32(3):030701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.030701. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Detecting Preanalytical Errors Using Quality Indicators in a Hematology Laboratory.使用血液学实验室中的质量指标检测分析前误差。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(3):176-183. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000343. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in Consideration with Pre analytical and Post analytical Quality Indicators.结合分析前和分析后质量指标评估实验室性能
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Apr;39(2):264-270. doi: 10.1007/s12291-022-01094-0. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety".临床实验室检验质量指标:从理论到实践. IFCC 工作组项目"检验误差与患者安全"的初步数据
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 May;49(5):835-44. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.128. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
8
Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation.检验医学中分析前误差的监测与报告:英国的情况
Ann Clin Biochem. 2016 Mar;53(Pt 2):279-84. doi: 10.1177/0004563215599561. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Three years of preanalytical errors: quality specifications and improvement through implementation of statistical process control.三年的分析前误差:通过实施统计过程控制来制定质量规范和改进。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(8):822-6. doi: 10.3109/00365510903288352.
10
Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).分析前质量改进。追求和谐,代表欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会(EFLM)分析前阶段工作组(WG-PRE)。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(3):357-70. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1051.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of external quality assessment in extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratories in Spain: a survey by the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC).西班牙临床实验室分析后阶段外部质量评估的应用:西班牙检验医学学会(SEQC)的一项调查
Adv Lab Med. 2025 Apr 21;6(2):199-205. doi: 10.1515/almed-2025-0067. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Adv Lab Med. 2025 Apr 3;6(2):206-212. doi: 10.1515/almed-2024-0160. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Evaluation of four quality indicators of the Pre-Analytical Phase External Quality Assessment Subprogram of the Fundación Bioquímica Argentina.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in error rates in the Australian key incident monitoring and management system program.澳大利亚关键事件监测和管理系统项目中的错误率变化。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Jun 15;30(2):020704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.020704. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers.血清还是血浆?一个古老的问题寻求新的答案。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jan 28;58(2):178-187. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0719.
3
Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: Performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.
阿根廷生物化学基金会分析前阶段外部质量评估子项目的四项质量指标评估
EJIFCC. 2023 Oct 16;34(3):203-212. eCollection 2023 Oct.
实验室医学中的分析前质量指标:参与 IFCC 工作组“实验室误差和患者安全”项目的实验室表现。
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Oct;497:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference.检验医学中定义性能规范的策略:米兰战略会议召开三年后。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Oct 26;55(12):1849-1856. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0772.
5
Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Error and Patient Safety" and EFLM Task and Finish Group "Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases".制定检验医学质量指标协调路线图:代表国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)“检验误差与患者安全”工作组以及欧洲临床化学和实验室医学学会(EFLM)“分析前和分析后阶段性能规范”任务与完成小组的共识声明。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Aug 28;55(10):1478-1488. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0412.
6
Extra-analytical quality indicators and laboratory performances.分析外质量指标与实验室性能
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
7
Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases of laboratory testing: Why and how.实验室检测分析前阶段的性能规范:原因与方法。
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):550-554. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.临床实验室检验质量指标:国际临床化学联合会工作组“检验误差及患者安全”项目进展状况。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):348-357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0929.
9
Spanish Preanalytical Quality Monitoring Program (SEQC), an overview of 12 years' experience.西班牙分析前质量监测计划(SEQC):12年经验概述
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(4):530-538. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0382.
10
The quality indicator paradox.质量指标悖论。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1119-22. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1080.