University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 May;4(3):312-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.959742. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance has not previously been applied in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Owing to increased contrast bolus dispersion due to the greater distance of travel through a bypass graft, this approach may result in systematic underestimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF). As resting MBF remains normal in segments supplied by noncritical coronary stenosis (<85%), measurement of perfusion in such territories may be utilized to reveal systematic error in the quantification of MBF. The objective of this study was to test whether absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance systematically underestimates MBF in segments subtended by bypass grafts.
The study population comprised 28 patients undergoing elective CABG for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Eligible patients had angiographic evidence of at least 1 myocardial segment subtended by a noncritically stenosed coronary artery (<85%). Subjects were studied at 1.5 T, with evaluation of resting MBF using model-independent deconvolution. Analyses were confined to myocardial segments subtended by native coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline, and MBF was compared in grafted and ungrafted segments before and after revascularization. A total of 249 segments were subtended by coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline. After revascularization, there was no significant difference in MBF in ungrafted (0.82±0.19 mL/min/g) versus grafted segments (0.82±0.15 mL/min/g, P=0.57). In the latter, MBF after revascularization did not change significantly from baseline (0.86±0.20 mL/min/g, P=0.82).
Model-independent deconvolution analysis does not systematically underestimate blood flow in graft-subtended territories, justifying the use of this methodology to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with CABG.
心血管磁共振的灌注绝对定量以前从未应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者。由于通过旁路移植的距离增加,导致对比剂团注弥散增加,这种方法可能导致心肌血流(MBF)的系统性低估。由于由非关键狭窄(<85%)供应的节段的静息 MBF 保持正常,因此可以测量这些区域的灌注以揭示 MBF 定量中的系统误差。本研究的目的是检验心血管磁共振的灌注绝对定量是否会系统性地低估旁路移植术所涉及的节段的 MBF。
研究人群包括 28 例行选择性 CABG 治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的患者。符合条件的患者具有至少 1 个由非临界狭窄(<85%)冠状动脉供应的心肌节段的血管造影证据。在 1.5 T 下对患者进行研究,使用无模型依赖性反卷积评估静息 MBF。分析仅限于在基线时狭窄<85%的原生冠状动脉供应的心肌节段,并比较了在再血管化前后移植和未移植的节段的 MBF。共有 249 个节段由基线时狭窄<85%的冠状动脉供应。再血管化后,未移植(0.82±0.19 mL/min/g)与移植节段(0.82±0.15 mL/min/g,P=0.57)的 MBF 无显着差异。在后一种情况下,再血管化后的 MBF 与基线相比没有明显变化(0.86±0.20 mL/min/g,P=0.82)。
无模型依赖性反卷积分析不会系统性地低估移植区域的血流,这证明了该方法可用于评估 CABG 患者的心肌灌注。