• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术与非手术治疗 Rockwood III 型肩锁关节分离:当前证据基础的荟萃分析。

Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1
PMID:21344264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3052422/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whilst there is little debate over the treatment of Rockwood grade V and VI acromioclavicular dislocation, the management of grade III acromioclavicular dislocation remains less clear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients managed operatively and non-operatively following grade III acromioclavicular dislocation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of published and unpublished material was conducted. All included studies were reviewed against the PEDro appraisal tool. Where appropriate, a meta-analysis of pooled results was conducted.

RESULTS

Among 724 citations, six studies met the eligibility criteria. All six studies were retrospective case series (level 4 evidence). The findings of this study indicated that operative management of grade III acromioclavicular dislocation results in a better cosmetic outcome (P < 0.0001) but greater duration of sick leave compared to non-operative management (P < 0.001). There was no difference in strength, pain, throwing ability and incidence of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis compared to non-operative management. Only one study recorded and showed a higher Constant score for operative management compared to non-operative management (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of well-designed studies in the literature to justify the optimum mode of treatment of grade III acromioclavicular dislocations.

摘要

背景

虽然对于 Rockwood 等级 V 和 VI 肩锁关节脱位的治疗方法几乎没有争议,但对于等级 III 肩锁关节脱位的治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较手术和非手术治疗等级 III 肩锁关节脱位患者的临床结果。

材料与方法

对已发表和未发表的资料进行了系统的回顾。所有纳入的研究均根据 PEDro 评估工具进行了评估。在适当的情况下,对汇总结果进行了荟萃分析。

结果

在 724 条引文中,有 6 项研究符合入选标准。这 6 项研究均为回顾性病例系列研究(证据等级 4)。本研究的结果表明,手术治疗等级 III 肩锁关节脱位的美容效果更好(P < 0.0001),但病假时间比非手术治疗更长(P < 0.001)。与非手术治疗相比,在力量、疼痛、投掷能力和肩锁关节骨关节炎的发生率方面没有差异。只有一项研究记录并显示手术治疗的 Constant 评分高于非手术治疗(P = 0.003)。

结论

文献中缺乏设计良好的研究来证明等级 III 肩锁关节脱位的最佳治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/09a7995f2add/10195_2011_127_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/5cff2b75b3ae/10195_2011_127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/633c46c4a858/10195_2011_127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/843ecf3ec620/10195_2011_127_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/4f0a5d720437/10195_2011_127_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/f24ec457cac7/10195_2011_127_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/09a7995f2add/10195_2011_127_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/5cff2b75b3ae/10195_2011_127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/633c46c4a858/10195_2011_127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/843ecf3ec620/10195_2011_127_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/4f0a5d720437/10195_2011_127_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/f24ec457cac7/10195_2011_127_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f3/3052422/09a7995f2add/10195_2011_127_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base.手术与非手术治疗 Rockwood III 型肩锁关节分离:当前证据基础的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
2
Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性高度肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗与非手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001004.
3
Surgical versus conservative management of Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review.Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗与保守治疗:一项系统评价
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jun 1;122(1):31-49. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx003.
4
No Significant Difference Between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review.缝线纽扣与钩钢板治疗急性Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的疗效无显著差异:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.055.
5
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.手术与保守干预治疗成人肩锁关节脱位的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD007429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007429.pub2.
6
Acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation: Conservative vs surgical approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis of current concepts in literature.急性 Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位:保守与手术治疗的比较。文献中当前概念的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3094-3101. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.050. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.五种不同手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1944-1958. doi: 10.1111/os.13731. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
9
Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性不稳定型肩锁关节脱位中,悬吊环固定装置与钩钢板的术后结局及并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Dec;18(4):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0451-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
10
Suture Button Could Result in More Functional Outcomes Improvement and Pain Relief Than Hook Plate Technique for Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.缝线纽扣固定术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效优于钩钢板固定术:一项比较研究的系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):553-566. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Autograft Reconstruction Successful in the Treatment of Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation?自体移植重建术治疗慢性肩锁关节分离是否成功?
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Mar 17;59(6):807-815. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01364-y. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Timing of Surgical Treatment for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes.高等级肩锁关节损伤的手术治疗时机不影响功能结果。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):101017. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101017. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited articles on acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
2
Complete dislocations of the acromiclavicular joint; the nature of the traumatic lesion and effective methods of treatment with an analysis of forty-one cases.肩锁关节完全脱位;创伤性损伤的性质及有效的治疗方法——附41例分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1946 Oct;28(4):813-37.
3
Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: a lack of evidence.
肩锁关节重建领域被引用次数最多的50篇文章的文献计量分析。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2025 Jan 30. doi: 10.1007/s12306-025-00886-w.
4
The Results of Hook Plate Fixation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation and Distal Clavicle Fractures.钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位及锁骨远端骨折的疗效
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jun 30;16:120306. doi: 10.52965/001c.120306. eCollection 2024.
5
Current Concepts in Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.肩锁关节损伤管理的当前概念
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 29;13(5):1413. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051413.
6
Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review.急性、重度肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Oct 29;3(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review.肩锁关节分离手术治疗后重返运动的标准:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Dec 31;2(2):140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.11.005. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization with chemically sterilized tendon allografts: A retrospective study.使用化学消毒肌腱同种异体移植物进行解剖学肩锁关节稳定术:一项回顾性研究。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Aug;15(4):411-423. doi: 10.1177/17585732221136863. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
9
Conservative treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint separation: a randomized controlled trial sling vs. brace.Rockwood III型肩锁关节分离的保守治疗:吊带与支具的随机对照试验
JSES Int. 2023 Mar 24;7(4):527-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.017. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON.肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:钩钢板与缝线纽扣钢板的比较
Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Apr 17;31(spe1):e252916. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916. eCollection 2023.
急性 III 度肩锁关节脱位的治疗:缺乏证据。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2008 Jun;9(2):105-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0013-7. Epub 2008 May 22.
4
Arthroscopic reconstruction of chronic AC joint dislocations by transposition of the coracoacromial ligament augmented by the Tight Rope device: a technical note.采用Tight Rope装置增强喙肩韧带转位的关节镜下慢性肩锁关节脱位重建术:技术说明
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Jan;17(1):92-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0633-8. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
5
Surgical treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular dislocation Tossy type III and V using the Hook plate.使用钩钢板治疗急性和慢性肩锁关节脱位Tossy III型和V型
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Aug;74(4):441-5.
6
Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment.罗克伍德Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位:手术治疗与保守治疗对比
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.017. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
7
Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for chronic acromioclavicular joint instability.关节镜辅助下喙锁韧带重建治疗慢性肩锁关节不稳
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Nov;128(11):1327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0547-9. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
8
Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment.肩锁关节脱位Rockwood III-V型:早期与延迟手术治疗的结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1153-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0524-3. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
9
Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions.使用物理治疗循证数据库量表评估药物和非药物干预随机对照试验方法的质量和可靠性估计。
Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):817-24.
10
Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury.III型肩锁关节损伤手术及保守治疗的临床和影像学结果
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.006.