Fondazione Edmund Mach-Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige, Centre for Technology Transfer, Via Edmund Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011 Oct;7(4):542-9. doi: 10.1002/ieam.185. Epub 2011 May 4.
Various pesticide risk indicators have been developed for estimating pesticide impact on human health and the environment. The present work applied a pesticide risk indicator to estimate change in pesticide risk in apple production between 2001 and 2009. The "Environmental Impact Quotient" was used, which evaluates potential impacts of pesticide active ingredients on farm workers, consumers, and nontarget organisms. A modified Environmental Impact Quotient was also tested, which accounts for all ingredients in the formulation presenting a health or environmental hazard, as identified in the Security Data Sheet. Irrespective of the rating system applied, an overall average improvement in environmental impact of apple protection strategies was indicated ranging from 23 to 24%. Hazard reduction was more significant when estimated per treatment, and was higher for acaricides and insecticides than for fungicides. Improvement appeared to be a consequence of using more selective and more effective active ingredients, applying alternative pest control techniques, compulsory periodic sprayer calibration, and wider use of dwarfing orchards. The modified Environmental Impact Quotient does not overcome all limitations regarding accuracy of pesticide risk indicators, but its ease of use in relying on official, easily accessible data, and the consistency of its results, makes it a good candidate for monitoring the success of reduced risk policies.
已经开发出各种农药风险指标,用于估计农药对人类健康和环境的影响。本研究应用农药风险指标来估计 2001 年至 2009 年期间苹果生产中农药风险的变化。采用“环境影响商数”来评估农药活性成分对农场工人、消费者和非靶标生物的潜在影响。还测试了一种经过修改的环境影响商数,该商数考虑了安全数据表中确定的制剂中所有对健康或环境构成危害的成分。无论应用哪种评分系统,均表明苹果保护策略的环境影响总体平均有所改善,范围在 23%至 24%之间。按每次处理估计,减少危害的效果更为显著,杀螨剂和杀虫剂的效果高于杀菌剂。改进似乎是由于使用更具选择性和更有效的活性成分、采用替代害虫防治技术、强制定期喷雾器校准以及更广泛地使用矮化果园的结果。经过修改的环境影响商数并没有克服农药风险指标准确性方面的所有限制,但它易于使用,依赖官方、易于获取的数据,以及结果的一致性,使其成为监测降低风险政策成功的良好候选指标。