• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将联合医疗数据查询平台与电子机构审查委员会信息系统集成。

Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems.

作者信息

He Shan, Hurdle John F, Botkin Jeffrey R, Narus Scott P

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:291-5.

PMID:21346987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041360/
Abstract

Human subjects are indispensable for clinical and translational research. Federal and local agencies issue regulations governing the conduct of research involving human subjects in order to properly protect study participants. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have the authority to review human subject research to ensure concordance with these regulations. One of the primary goals of the IRB oversight is to protect research participants' privacy by carefully reviewing the data used and disclosed during a study. However, there are major challenges for IRBs in the typical research process. Due to the information disconnect between the data providers (e.g., a clinical data warehouse) and the IRB, it is often impossible to tell exactly what data has been disclosed to investigators. This causes time-consuming, inefficient, and often ineffective monitoring of clinical studies. This paper proposes an integrated architecture that interconnects a federated healthcare data query platform with an electronic IRB system.

摘要

人类受试者对于临床和转化研究不可或缺。联邦和地方机构发布有关涉及人类受试者研究行为的法规,以妥善保护研究参与者。机构审查委员会(IRB)有权审查人类受试者研究,以确保符合这些法规。IRB监督的主要目标之一是通过仔细审查研究期间使用和披露的数据来保护研究参与者的隐私。然而,在典型的研究过程中,IRB面临重大挑战。由于数据提供者(例如临床数据仓库)与IRB之间存在信息脱节,往往无法确切知道已向研究人员披露了哪些数据。这导致对临床研究的监测既耗时又低效,而且往往无效。本文提出了一种集成架构,将联邦医疗数据查询平台与电子IRB系统互连。

相似文献

1
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems.将联合医疗数据查询平台与电子机构审查委员会信息系统集成。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:291-5.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges.机构审查委员会:目的与挑战。
Chest. 2015 Nov;148(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0706.
4
Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.美国机构审查委员会(IRB)的运作特点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):276-286. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1670276. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Computerized information management for institutional review boards.机构审查委员会的计算机化信息管理
Comput Inform Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;23(4):190-8; quiz 199-200. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200507000-00005.
6
Toward a fully de-identified biomedical information warehouse.迈向完全去识别化的生物医学信息仓库。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:370-4.
7
Clinical research regulation: challenges to the institutional review board system.临床研究监管:机构审查委员会制度面临的挑战
Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.012.
8
Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.记者、地方检察官和研究人员:为何机构审查委员会应介入其中。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Mar 29;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0015-y.
9
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
10
The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.机构审查委员会的目的、组成和功能:平衡优先事项
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1330-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Care Innovation through Data-Driven Discoveries in the Electronic Health Record.电子健康记录中的数据驱动发现推动心血管护理创新。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:136-148. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.104. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics.电子机构审查委员会(eIRB)系统的领域分析模型:解决临床研究信息学中的薄弱环节
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
3
Federated querying architecture with clinical & translational health IT application.联邦查询架构与临床和转化健康信息技术应用。
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1211-24. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9720-3. Epub 2011 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Architecture of a federated query engine for heterogeneous resources.用于异构资源的联邦查询引擎架构。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:70-4.
2
Principal investigator views of the IRB system.主要研究者对机构审查委员会系统的看法。
Int J Med Sci. 2008 Apr 2;5(2):68-72. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5.68.
3
Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?机构审查委员会与卫生服务研究中的多中心研究:是否存在更好的方法?
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):291-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00354.x.
4
Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.国家临床研究事业面临的核心挑战。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.
5
Protecting research participants.保护研究参与者。
Pediatrics. 2002 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):402-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.2.402.
6
Multisite randomized controlled trials in health services research: scientific challenges and operational issues.卫生服务研究中的多中心随机对照试验:科学挑战与操作问题
Med Care. 2001 Jun;39(6):627-34. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200106000-00010.