• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子机构审查委员会(eIRB)系统的领域分析模型:解决临床研究信息学中的薄弱环节

A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics.

作者信息

He Shan, Narus Scott P, Facelli Julio C, Lau Lee Min, Botkin Jefferey R, Hurdle John F

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Intermountain Medical Center, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.003
PMID:24929181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4384433/
Abstract

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are a critical component of clinical research and can become a significant bottleneck due to the dramatic increase, in both volume and complexity of clinical research. Despite the interest in developing clinical research informatics (CRI) systems and supporting data standards to increase clinical research efficiency and interoperability, informatics research in the IRB domain has not attracted much attention in the scientific community. The lack of standardized and structured application forms across different IRBs causes inefficient and inconsistent proposal reviews and cumbersome workflows. These issues are even more prominent in multi-institutional clinical research that is rapidly becoming the norm. This paper proposes and evaluates a domain analysis model for electronic IRB (eIRB) systems, paving the way for streamlined clinical research workflow via integration with other CRI systems and improved IRB application throughput via computer-assisted decision support.

摘要

机构审查委员会(IRB)是临床研究的关键组成部分,由于临床研究的数量和复杂性急剧增加,它可能会成为一个重大瓶颈。尽管人们对开发临床研究信息学(CRI)系统和支持数据标准以提高临床研究效率和互操作性很感兴趣,但IRB领域的信息学研究在科学界并未引起太多关注。不同IRB之间缺乏标准化和结构化的申请表,导致提案审查效率低下且不一致,工作流程繁琐。这些问题在迅速成为常态的多机构临床研究中更为突出。本文提出并评估了一种电子IRB(eIRB)系统的领域分析模型,为通过与其他CRI系统集成简化临床研究工作流程以及通过计算机辅助决策支持提高IRB申请处理量铺平了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/eb1f65d3c0e6/nihms605522f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/33ea7e221a05/nihms605522f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/a840b4f8fd75/nihms605522f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/256faba9334c/nihms605522f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/dc510f047b8c/nihms605522f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/da208bf03bc6/nihms605522f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/eb1f65d3c0e6/nihms605522f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/33ea7e221a05/nihms605522f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/a840b4f8fd75/nihms605522f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/256faba9334c/nihms605522f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/dc510f047b8c/nihms605522f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/da208bf03bc6/nihms605522f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dd6/4384433/eb1f65d3c0e6/nihms605522f6.jpg

相似文献

1
A domain analysis model for eIRB systems: addressing the weak link in clinical research informatics.电子机构审查委员会(eIRB)系统的领域分析模型:解决临床研究信息学中的薄弱环节
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
IRB reliance: An informatics approach.机构审查委员会的依赖:一种信息学方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
3
An Analysis of Information Technology Adoption by IRBs of Large Academic Medical Centers in the United States.美国大型学术医疗中心的机构审查委员会对信息技术的采用情况分析
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):31-6. doi: 10.1177/1556264614560146. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.减少单一 IRB 负担:简化电子 IRB 系统。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-40. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818877. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems.将联合医疗数据查询平台与电子机构审查委员会信息系统集成。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:291-5.
7
Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.了解机构审查委员会:IRB审查过程实用指南
Nutr Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;22(6):618-28. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022006618.
8
Are central institutional review boards the solution? The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group's report on optimizing the IRB process.中心机构审查委员会是解决方案吗?国家心肺血液研究所工作组关于优化 IRB 流程的报告。
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1710-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182720859.
9
"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.“同一俱乐部的成员”:美国机构审查委员会在识别和管理利益冲突方面面临的挑战和决策。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022796. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
The roles, challenges and institutionalization of institutional review boards.机构审查委员会的作用、挑战与制度化
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;18(2):115-9. doi: 10.4314/nqjhm.v18i2.45000.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.减少单一 IRB 负担:简化电子 IRB 系统。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-40. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818877. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
The development of large-scale de-identified biomedical databases in the age of genomics-principles and challenges.基因组时代大规模去识别生物医学数据库的发展:原则与挑战。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 10;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0147-5.
3
IRB reliance: An informatics approach.机构审查委员会的依赖:一种信息学方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics.用于临床、转化和比较效果研究的信息技术。《2015年年鉴》临床研究信息学部分的研究结果。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):178-82. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-030.

本文引用的文献

1
A Biomedical Research Permissions Ontology: Cognitive and Knowledge Representation Considerations.一种生物医学研究许可本体:认知与知识表示考量
Proc Gov Technol Inf Policies (2010). 2010 Dec;2010:9-13. doi: 10.1145/1920320.1920322.
2
Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.临床研究信息学:概念视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e36-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000968. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
3
Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.机构审查委员会给研究带来的负担:证据现状及其对监管改革的影响。
Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):599-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00644.x.
4
Protecting research subjects: IRBs in a changing research landscape.
IRB. 2011 Mar-Apr;33(2):14-9.
5
The human studies database project: federating human studies design data using the ontology of clinical research.人类研究数据库项目:使用临床研究本体联合人类研究设计数据。
Summit Transl Bioinform. 2010 Mar 1;2010:51-5.
6
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems.将联合医疗数据查询平台与电子机构审查委员会信息系统集成。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:291-5.
7
Clinical research informatics: challenges, opportunities and definition for an emerging domain.临床研究信息学:一个新兴领域的挑战、机遇与定义
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):316-27. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3005. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
8
Survey of u.s. Human research protection organizations: workload and membership.美国人类研究保护组织调查:工作量与成员情况
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Dec;3(4):57-69. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.4.57.
9
Principal investigator views of the IRB system.主要研究者对机构审查委员会系统的看法。
Int J Med Sci. 2008 Apr 2;5(2):68-72. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5.68.
10
The BRIDG project: a technical report.BRIDG项目:一份技术报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):130-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2556. Epub 2007 Dec 20.