Panchulidze Irakli, Berner Stacey, Mantovani Gustavo, Liverneaux Philippe
Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Illkirch, France.
Hand Surg. 2011;16(1):1-3. doi: 10.1142/S0218810411004984.
Robotically assisted telemanipulators are often criticised for their lack of direct haptic feedback. However, robotically assisted microsurgical sutures have already been achieved successfully. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that haptic feedback is not necessary in microsurgery. Our series included 24 surgeons of whom 14 were micro-surgeons. Each of them had to tighten a 9/0 and a 10/0 pre-tied nylon thread until getting the sensation of optimal knot tying. The procedure was performed four times, with open and closed eyes. The quality of knot tying was evaluated (fully tied, fairly or incompletely tied, or broken thread). The results obtained with the eyes open were significantly better. Neither the material size, nor the surgeon's expertise was shown to have an impact on knot tying quality. Our results demonstrate the uselessness of haptic feedback in microsurgery.
机器人辅助远程操作器常因缺乏直接触觉反馈而受到批评。然而,机器人辅助显微外科缝合已经成功实现。本研究的目的是证明触觉反馈在显微手术中并非必要。我们的研究对象包括24名外科医生,其中14名是显微外科医生。他们每个人都必须收紧一根9/0和一根10/0的预打结尼龙线,直到获得最佳打结感觉。该操作进行了四次,分别在睁眼和闭眼的情况下。对打结质量进行了评估(完全打结、打结尚可或不完全打结、或线断裂)。睁眼时获得的结果明显更好。材料尺寸和外科医生的专业技能均未显示对打结质量有影响。我们的结果证明了触觉反馈在显微手术中并无用处。