Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0527-x. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
Light supplying to luting resin cements is impeded in several clinical situations, causing us to question whether materials can properly be cured to achieve adequately (or adequate) mechanical properties. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse the effect of light on the micro-mechanical properties of eight popular dual-cured self-adhesive resin cements by comparing them with two conventional, also dual-cured, resin cements. Four different curing procedures were applied: auto-polymerisation (dark curing) and light curing (LED unit, Freelight 2, 20 s) by applying the unit directly on the samples' surface, at a distance of 5 and 10 mm. Twenty minutes after curing, the samples were stored for 1 week at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere. The micro-mechanical properties-Vickers hardness, modulus of elasticity, creep and elastic/plastic deformation-were measured. Data were analysed with multivariate ANOVA followed by Tukey's test and partial eta-squared statistics (p < 0.05). A very strong influence of the material as well as filler volume and weight on the micro-mechanical properties was measured, whereas the influence of the curing procedure and type of cement-conventional or self-adhesive-was generally low. The influence of light on the polymerisation process was material dependent, with four different behaviour patterns to be distinguished. As a material category, significantly higher micro-mechanical properties were measured for the conventional compared to the self-adhesive resin cements, although this difference was low. Within the self-adhesive resin cements group, the variation in micro-mechanical properties was high. The selection of suitable resin cements should be done by considering, besides its adhesive properties, its micro-mechanical properties and curing behaviour also.
在几种临床情况下,粘固树脂的光供应受到阻碍,这使我们质疑材料是否可以正确固化以达到足够(或足够)的机械性能。因此,本研究的目的是通过将八种流行的双固化自粘树脂水门汀与两种传统的双固化树脂水门汀进行比较,分析光对它们的微观机械性能的影响。应用了四种不同的固化程序:自聚合(暗固化)和光固化(LED 单元,Freelight 2,20 s),将单元直接施加在样品表面上,距离为 5 和 10 mm。固化 20 分钟后,将样品在 37°C 的水饱和气氛中储存 1 周。测量微观机械性能-维氏硬度、弹性模量、蠕变和弹性/塑性变形。使用多元方差分析(MANOVA)和 Tukey 检验以及偏 eta-平方统计(p < 0.05)对数据进行分析。测量结果表明,材料以及填料体积和重量对微观机械性能有很强的影响,而固化程序和水泥类型(传统或自粘)的影响通常较低。光对聚合过程的影响取决于材料,可区分出四种不同的行为模式。作为一种材料类别,与自粘树脂水门汀相比,传统的树脂水门汀具有明显更高的微观机械性能,尽管这种差异很小。在自粘树脂水门汀组内,微观机械性能的变化很大。除了其粘合性能外,还应考虑其微观机械性能和固化行为来选择合适的树脂水门汀。