Department of Pharmaceutics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, PR China.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 May 15;55(2):342-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.01.044. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
This study was designed to evaluate the in vitro release, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and PK-PD relationships of atenolol sustained-release pellets (AT-SRPs), compared with those of atenolol immediate-release pellets (AT-IRPs). Blood sampling for AT plasma concentration was performed in normal rats and blood pressure-lowering effects were recorded continuously in hypertensive rats (HRs) before and at 1, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h after drug administration. The parameters were calculated using DAS1.0 program and WinNonlin software. The release profile of SRPs was steadier and more sustained than that of IRPs. The mean Cmax and area under concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h after administration (AUC0-24 h) of SRPs were significantly lower than that of IRPs (p<0.05), while area under concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) was almost equivalent between the two formulations. The mean half life time (t1/2) of AT-SRPs was almost 2 times longer compared to that of AT-IRPs. The SRPs approximately achieved half of peak drug effect (Emax) of IRPs, while there were no significant differences in the area under effect-time curve from 0 to 24 h after administration (AUEC0-24 h) and the area under effect-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUEC0-∞). The value of the rate constant of equilibration between plasma and the effect-site (ke0) for SRPs was about 4 times higher than IRPs. The effect-concentration-time course for AT-SRPs was represented by the clockwise hysteresis loop, while the counter-clockwise hysteresis loop well showed that for AT-IRPs. The more favorable characteristics of SRPs would make it more appropriate as a potential dosage form for the treatment of hypertension.
本研究旨在评价阿替洛尔控释微丸(AT-SRPs)与阿替洛尔普通速释微丸(AT-IRPs)的体外释放、药代动力学(PK)、药效学(PD)和 PK-PD 关系。在正常大鼠和高血压大鼠(HRs)中分别进行 AT 血浆浓度的血样采集,并在给药后 1、4、8、12、16 和 24 h 连续记录降压作用。使用 DAS1.0 程序和 WinNonlin 软件计算参数。SRPs 的释放曲线比 IRPs 更稳定和更持久。SRPs 的 Cmax 和给药后 0 至 24 h 的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-24 h)均显著低于 IRPs(p<0.05),而两种制剂的浓度-时间曲线下面积从 0 至无穷大(AUC0-∞)几乎相等。AT-SRPs 的平均半衰期(t1/2)几乎是 AT-IRPs 的 2 倍。SRPs 大约达到了 IRPs 的峰值药物效应(Emax)的一半,而给药后 0 至 24 h 的效应-时间曲线下面积(AUEC0-24 h)和从 0 至无穷大的效应-时间曲线下面积(AUEC0-∞)没有显著差异。SRPs 的血浆与效应部位之间平衡常数(ke0)的速率常数约为 IRPs 的 4 倍。AT-SRPs 的效应-浓度-时间曲线呈顺时针滞后环,而 AT-IRPs 则呈逆时针滞后环。SRPs 的更有利特征使其更适合作为治疗高血压的潜在剂型。