Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.030.
To determine the percentage of full-time wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries who felt they could evacuate from various locations, and the percentage who have a plan for evacuation. Study results will help clinicians and emergency officials understand needs related to evacuation preparedness.
Convenience sample survey.
Six Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers, part of the national database funded through the Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
People (N=487) with spinal cord injuries who use a wheelchair more than 40 hours a week.
Not applicable.
The percentage of wheelchair users who felt they would be able to safely evacuate, had a plan for safe evacuation, or reported a need for assistive technology and human assistance to evacuate from various locations in the event of an emergency.
The highest percentage of participants felt they would be able to safely evacuate and had a plan for work evacuation. The lowest percentage of participants reported they could evacuate from their city/town in the event of an emergency and had a plan to evacuate their city/town in the event of a natural disaster. A large difference exists between the percentage of participants who felt they could evacuate and those who have a plan for evacuation.
A large discrepancy exists between the perception that one can evacuate and actually having a plan. The perception that one can evacuate without a plan or the use of assistive technology is an area of concern that must be further addressed by educators. Education must emphasize the need to have a defined evacuation plan and effective utilization of assistive technology.
确定全职使用轮椅的脊髓损伤患者中有多少人认为自己可以从不同地点撤离,以及有多少人有撤离计划。研究结果将帮助临床医生和应急官员了解与撤离准备相关的需求。
便利抽样调查。
六个脊髓损伤模型系统中心,是由教育部、国家残疾与康复研究所在国家数据库资助的一部分。
每周使用轮椅超过 40 小时的脊髓损伤患者(N=487)。
不适用。
认为自己能够安全撤离、有安全撤离计划或报告在紧急情况下需要辅助技术和人力协助从不同地点撤离的轮椅使用者比例。
最高比例的参与者认为自己能够安全撤离,并制定了工作场所撤离计划。报告能够在紧急情况下从所在城市/城镇撤离且有计划在发生自然灾害时撤离的参与者比例最低。认为自己能够撤离的参与者比例与有撤离计划的参与者比例之间存在很大差异。
对自己能够撤离的看法与实际制定计划之间存在很大差异。在没有计划或使用辅助技术的情况下认为自己能够撤离的观点是一个需要进一步解决的问题,这必须得到教育者的关注。教育必须强调制定明确的撤离计划和有效利用辅助技术的必要性。