• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟介入放射医师放射暴露时,悬吊式放射防护系统与标准铅围裙的比较。

Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.016
PMID:21354818
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiation protective characteristics of a system designed to enhance operator protection while eliminating weight to the body and allowing freedom of motion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation doses to a mock interventionalist were measured with calibrated dosimeters in a clinical interventional suite. A standard lead apron (SLA; Pb equivalent, 0.5 mm) was compared with a suspended radiation protection system (ZeroGravity; Zgrav) that shields from the top of the head to the calves (except the right arm and left forearm) with a complex overhead motion system that eliminates weight on the operator and allows freedom of motion. Zgrav included a suspended lead apron with increased lead equivalency, greater length, proximal left arm and shoulder coverage, and a wraparound face shield of 0.5 mm Pb equivalency. A 26-cm-thick Lucite stack (ie, mock patient) created scatter during 10 controlled angiography sequences of 120 exposures each. Parameters included a field of view of 40 cm, table height of 94 cm, 124 cm from the tube to image intensifier, 50 cm from the image center to operator, 66 kVp, and 466-470 mA.

RESULTS

Under identical conditions, average doses (SLA vs Zgrav) were 264 versus 3.4 (ratio, 78) to left axilla (P < .001), 456 versus 10.2 (ratio, 45) to left eye (P < .001), 379.4 versus 6.6 (ratio, 57) to right eye (P < .005), and 18.8 versus 1.2 (ratio, 16) to gonad (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to a conventional lead apron, the Zgrav system provided a 16-78-fold decrease in radiation exposure for a mock interventionalist in a simulated clinical setting.

摘要

目的

评估一种旨在增强操作人员保护、减轻身体负担并允许自由运动的系统的辐射防护特性。

材料和方法

在临床介入套房中,使用校准剂量计测量模拟介入医生的辐射剂量。将标准铅围裙(SLA;Pb 当量,0.5 毫米)与悬浮辐射防护系统(ZeroGravity;Zgrav)进行比较,该系统通过复杂的头顶运动系统屏蔽从头顶到小腿(除右臂和左前臂外),消除操作员的重量并允许自由运动。Zgrav 包括一个悬浮铅围裙,具有更高的 Pb 当量、更长的长度、近端左手臂和肩部覆盖范围以及 0.5 毫米 Pb 当量的环绕式面罩。一个 26 厘米厚的有机玻璃堆(即模拟患者)在 10 个 120 次曝光的控制血管造影序列中产生散射。参数包括 40 厘米的视野、94 厘米高的桌子、从管到影像增强器 124 厘米、从影像中心到操作员 50 厘米、66 kVp 和 466-470 mA。

结果

在相同条件下,左侧腋窝的平均剂量(SLA 与 Zgrav)分别为 264 与 3.4(比值,78)(P<0.001),左眼为 456 与 10.2(比值,45)(P<0.001),右眼为 379.4 与 6.6(比值,57)(P<0.005),以及性腺为 18.8 与 1.2(比值,16)(P<0.001)。

结论

与传统的铅围裙相比,在模拟临床环境中,Zgrav 系统为模拟介入医生提供了 16-78 倍的辐射暴露减少。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.模拟介入放射医师放射暴露时,悬吊式放射防护系统与标准铅围裙的比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
2
A novel complete radiation protection system eliminates physician radiation exposure and leaded aprons.一种新型的完备辐射防护系统可消除医生的辐射暴露和铅围裙。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):11-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24625. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.介入放射科医生:铅防护围裙设计的必要演变。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):443. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.11.004.
4
Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.基于服装特性和制造商标签信息的防护服临床评估
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学职业放射防护建议。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24694. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite.比较介入放射学套房中用于保护操作人员眼睛的策略。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Nov;21(11):1703-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.07.019.
7
Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.经桡动脉入路冠状动脉造影术中散射辐射的减少:使用无铅辐射屏蔽的随机试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):97-102. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22947. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
8
Radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization lab: shifting the focus from low dose, to "no dose" exposure.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):17-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25027.
9
Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment.介入实验室中的职业健康危害:营造更安全环境的时候到了。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):147-52; quiz 53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
10
Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment.介入实验室中的职业健康危害:营造更安全环境的时候到了。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 15;73(3):432-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21801.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Cardiac Catheterization Safety: Novel Radiation Protection Approaches Redefining Occupational Health.心脏导管插入术安全性的进展:新型辐射防护方法重新定义职业健康。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2025;21(1):e1573403X304828. doi: 10.2174/011573403X304828240819050538.
2
Assessing and improving radiation safety in cardiac catheterization: a study from Cairo University Hospital.评估与改善心脏导管插入术中的辐射安全:开罗大学医院的一项研究
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Feb 9;76(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00449-7.
3
Musculoskeletal disorders in interventional radiology workers: an integrative review.
介入放射学工作人员的肌肉骨骼疾病:一项综合综述。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023 Aug 8;21(2):e2022860. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-860. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Physical strain while wearing personal radiation protection systems in interventional radiology.佩戴个人辐射防护系统进行介入放射学操作时的体力负荷。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271664. eCollection 2022.
5
What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?对于放射医学工作者,尤其是介入放射学人员而言,有哪些有用的方法可以减少职业辐射暴露?
Radiol Phys Technol. 2022 Jun;15(2):101-115. doi: 10.1007/s12194-022-00660-8. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations.介入心脏病专家的辐射防护:实用方法与创新
World J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 26;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i1.1.
7
Eye protection in interventional procedures.介入操作中的眼部防护。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Oct 1;94(1126):20210436. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210436.
8
Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory.介入放射学中的人体工程学:提高认识是必需的。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 14;57(5):500. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050500.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Minimal- versus Zero-fluoroscopy Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Prospective Study.低荧光与零荧光透视下射频导管消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性:一项多中心前瞻性研究
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Nov 15;11(11):4281-4291. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111105. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Minimizing Radiation in the Modern Electrophysiology Laboratory.现代电生理实验室中的辐射最小化
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Aug 15;9(8):3265-3270. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090805. eCollection 2018 Aug.