• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佩戴个人辐射防护系统进行介入放射学操作时的体力负荷。

Physical strain while wearing personal radiation protection systems in interventional radiology.

机构信息

Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271664. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271664
PMID:35862403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9302834/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Multiple studies show orthopedic health problems for medical staff due to wearing radiation protection aprons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the weight pressure on the shoulder as a marker of physical strain caused by different radiation-protection devices.

METHODS

For the weight pressure measurement, a pressure sensor (OMD-30-SE-100N, OptoForce, Budapest, Hungary) placed on the left and right shoulder was used. Wearing different radiation protection systems the force measurement system was used to quantify the weight pressure. Measurements were acquired in still standing position and during various movements.

RESULTS

A mean significant decreasing weight pressure on the shoulder between 74% and 84% (p<0.001) was measured, when the free-hanging radiation protection system was used in comparison to one-piece and two-piece radiation protection aprons and coats. Using two-piece radiation protection aprons, the weight pressure was significantly lower than that of one-piece radiation protection coats. If a belt was used for the one-piece radiation protection coat, the weight pressure on the shoulder was reduced by 32.5% (p = 0.003). For a two-piece radiation protection apron and a one-piece radiation protection coat (with and without belt) a significant different weight pressure distribution between the right and left shoulder could be measured.

CONCLUSIONS

The free-hanging radiation protection system showed a significant lower weight pressure in comparison to the other radiation protection devices. Apart from this, use of a two-piece radiation protection apron or addition of a belt to a radiation protection coat proved to be further effective options to reduce weight pressure.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,医务人员因穿着辐射防护围裙而存在骨科健康问题。本研究旨在评估肩部的重量压力,作为由不同辐射防护设备引起的身体劳损的标志物。

方法

为了进行重量压力测量,使用了一个压力传感器(OMD-30-SE-100N,OptoForce,布达佩斯,匈牙利)放置在左肩部和右肩部。使用不同的辐射防护系统,力测量系统用于量化重量压力。测量在静止站立位置和各种运动期间进行。

结果

与一件式和两件式辐射防护围裙和外套相比,使用自由悬挂的辐射防护系统时,肩部的重量压力平均显著降低了 74%至 84%(p<0.001)。使用两件式辐射防护围裙时,肩部的重量压力明显低于一件式辐射防护外套。如果在一件式辐射防护外套上使用腰带,则肩部的重量压力降低 32.5%(p=0.003)。对于两件式辐射防护围裙和一件式辐射防护外套(带或不带腰带),可以测量到右肩和左肩之间明显不同的重量压力分布。

结论

与其他辐射防护设备相比,自由悬挂的辐射防护系统显示出明显更低的重量压力。除此之外,使用两件式辐射防护围裙或在辐射防护外套上增加腰带被证明是进一步有效降低重量压力的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/0412b9a37f89/pone.0271664.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/531f375e51b9/pone.0271664.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/4658455f6507/pone.0271664.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/c19672516133/pone.0271664.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/0412b9a37f89/pone.0271664.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/531f375e51b9/pone.0271664.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/4658455f6507/pone.0271664.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/c19672516133/pone.0271664.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e53/9302834/0412b9a37f89/pone.0271664.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical strain while wearing personal radiation protection systems in interventional radiology.佩戴个人辐射防护系统进行介入放射学操作时的体力负荷。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271664. eCollection 2022.
2
Modified design of x-ray protective clothing to enhance radiation protection for interventional radiologists.改良型 X 射线防护服设计,提升介入放射科医生的辐射防护水平。
Med Phys. 2023 Jun;50(6):3825-3832. doi: 10.1002/mp.16309. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.X 射线防护围裙重新评估。
Rofo. 2023 Mar;195(3):234-243. doi: 10.1055/a-1994-7332. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.非铅防护围裙在介入操作医生辐射防护中的效用。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;131(4):531-4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn244. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
5
Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?我们应该在围兜方面保持领先吗?
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Mar;21(1):2-6. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.X射线防护围裙在实验和实际应用领域的有效性评估。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2014 Jan;7(1):158-66. doi: 10.1007/s12194-013-0246-x. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
7
Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study.用于在临床环境中保护介入放射科医生免受辐射暴露的无铅防护围裙:一项初步研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;11(9):1613. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091613.
8
What happened when medical staff in Beijing, China wore over-apron dosemeters?当中国北京的医务人员佩戴围裙式剂量计时,发生了什么?
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Jul 5;199(11):1190-1194. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncad161.
9
[Influence of storage conditions and usage time on the quality of lead rubber].[储存条件及使用时间对铅橡胶质量的影响]
Med Pr. 2022 Feb 18;73(1):13-17. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01121. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Occupational orthopedic problems and its relation to personal radiation protection in interventional radiology.介入放射学中的职业骨科问题及其与个人放射防护的关系。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jun;175:111401. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111401. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of musculoskeletal complaints affecting the professional or private life of physicians with different exposure times to lead aprons: a cross-sectional study.针对不同铅围裙暴露时长的医生,对影响其职业或私人生活的肌肉骨骼不适情况进行调查:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Sep 15;26(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09134-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation?锑铋防护围裙在提供散射辐射防护方面与铅橡胶围裙一样有效吗?
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2018 Jun;49(2):201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
Personal Radiation Protection and Corresponding Dosimetry in Interventional Radiology: An Overview and Future Developments.介入放射学中的个人辐射防护及相应剂量学:综述与未来发展
Rofo. 2019 Jun;191(6):512-521. doi: 10.1055/a-0800-0113. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting.
新的放射防护系统在介入放射学环境中的有效性。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Sep;106:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
Society of Interventional Radiology: Occupational Back and Neck Pain and the Interventional Radiologist.介入放射学会:职业性颈背痛与介入放射科医生
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
5
Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers.心血管介入导管室工作人员的职业健康风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003273. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003273.
6
A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures.一项关于在神经血管内介入手术中,将零重力系统与标准铅围裙作为辐射防护策略的前瞻性病例对照比较。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Oct;8(10):1052-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012038. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: Results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey.当前十年介入心脏病学家的职业健康危害:2014年心血管造影和介入学会会员调查结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):913-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25927. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
The effect of frontpacks, shoulder bags and handheld bags on 3D back shape and posture in young university students: an ISIS2 study.背包、肩包和手提包对青年大学生三维背部形态及姿势的影响:一项ISIS2研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;176:117-21.
9
Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.模拟介入放射医师放射暴露时,悬吊式放射防护系统与标准铅围裙的比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
10
Carrying a rucksack on either shoulder or the back, does it matter? Load induced functional scoliosis in "normal" young subjects.将背包背在一侧肩膀或背上,这有关系吗?“正常”年轻受试者中负荷诱发的功能性脊柱侧弯。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;140:221-4.