Vörös Károly, Nolte Ingo, Hungerbühler Stephan, Reiczigel Jeno, Ehlers Jan P, Tater Guy, Mischke Reinhard, Zimmering Tanja, Schneider Matthias
Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Hanover, Germany.
Acta Vet Hung. 2011 Mar;59(1):23-35. doi: 10.1556/AVet.59.2011.1.3.
The goals of this study were to present a technique of digitalised sound recordings and phonocardiograms (dPCGs), and to analyse its diagnostic capabilities. Heart sounds of 20 dogs were auscultated in vivo (on-line) and recorded with dPCGs by two authors using a Welch Allyn Meditron Stethoscope System. Sound recordings were auscultated off-line and blindly by four different observers having various auscultatory experiences, then listened to while viewing dPCGs. The results were compared to echocardiographic diagnoses. There was a significant agreement (p < 0.001) between on-line and off-line auscultatory findings regarding the four observers, ranging from 45% to 75% (weighted kappa values: 0.72 to 0.87). The best agreement was achieved by Observer 1 having the highest experience. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between Observer 1 and Observer 4 (with the lowest experience) in judging the quality of the murmurs during the off-line and blind auscultation. However, there were only minimal differences (95% to 100% agreements) in dPCG analyses among the four observers regarding intensity and quality of the murmurs while simultaneously listening to and viewing the dPCGs. Significant correlations were found between the traditional '0 to 6 scale' and a new '0 to 3 scale' murmur intensity gradings by all observers (correlation coefficients 0.640 to 0.908; p < 0.01 to p < 0.001). Analysis of dPCGs might be a valuable, additional tool helping with the diagnosis of canine cardiac murmurs, especially for those with less cardiological experience.
本研究的目的是介绍一种数字化录音和心音图(dPCG)技术,并分析其诊断能力。由两位作者使用Welch Allyn Meditron听诊器系统在体内(在线)听诊20只犬的心音,并用dPCG进行记录。四位具有不同听诊经验的观察者离线且盲法听诊录音,然后在查看dPCG的同时聆听。将结果与超声心动图诊断进行比较。四位观察者在线和离线听诊结果之间存在显著一致性(p < 0.001),范围为45%至75%(加权kappa值:0.72至0.87)。经验最丰富的观察者1达成了最佳一致性。在离线盲法听诊期间判断杂音质量时,观察者1和经验最少的观察者4之间发现了显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,在四位观察者同时聆听和查看dPCG时,就杂音强度和质量而言,dPCG分析之间只有极小的差异(一致性为95%至100%)。所有观察者在传统的“0至6级”和新的“0至3级”杂音强度分级之间均发现显著相关性(相关系数0.640至0.908;p < 0.01至p < 0.001)。dPCG分析可能是一种有价值的辅助工具,有助于犬心杂音的诊断,特别是对于那些心脏病学经验较少的人。