• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用听力策略理解构音障碍和脑瘫患者的言语。

Use of listening strategies for the speech of individuals with dysarthria and cerebral palsy.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Mar;27(1):5-15. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.532509.

DOI:10.3109/07434618.2010.532509
PMID:21355809
Abstract

This study examined listeners' endorsement of cognitive, linguistic, segmental, and suprasegmental strategies employed when listening to speakers with dysarthria. The study also examined whether strategy endorsement differed between listeners who earned the highest and lowest intelligibility scores. Speakers were eight individuals with dysarthria and cerebral palsy. Listeners were 80 individuals who transcribed speech stimuli and rated their use of each of 24 listening strategies on a 4-point scale. Results showed that cognitive and linguistic strategies were most highly endorsed. Use of listening strategies did not differ between listeners with the highest and lowest intelligibility scores. Results suggest that there may be a core of strategies common to listeners of speakers with dysarthria that may be supplemented by additional strategies, based on characteristics of the speaker and speech signal.

摘要

本研究考察了听众在聆听患有口吃者时对认知、语言、音段和超音段策略的认可情况。该研究还考察了策略认可是否因得分最高和最低的听众而异。演讲者是八名患有口吃和脑瘫的人。听众是 80 名转录语音刺激并对 24 种听力策略中的每一种使用情况进行 4 分制评分的人。结果表明,认知和语言策略最受认可。在理解能力得分最高和最低的听众之间,使用听力策略没有差异。结果表明,对于口吃者的听众来说,可能存在一组共同的策略核心,这些策略可能会根据演讲者和语音信号的特点得到补充。

相似文献

1
Use of listening strategies for the speech of individuals with dysarthria and cerebral palsy.使用听力策略理解构音障碍和脑瘫患者的言语。
Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Mar;27(1):5-15. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.532509.
2
Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.构音障碍性言语的可懂度:说话者与听众的认知
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):633-48. doi: 10.1080/13682820801887117.
3
Aided and unaided speech supplementation strategies: effect of alphabet cues and iconic hand gestures on dysarthric speech.辅助和非辅助言语补充策略:字母线索和标志性手势对构音障碍言语的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):996-1012. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/068).
4
Effects of speech stimuli and dysarthria severity on intelligibility scores and listener confidence ratings for speakers with cerebral palsy.言语刺激和构音障碍严重程度对脑瘫患者可懂度得分及听众信心评级的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2007;59(6):306-17. doi: 10.1159/000108337.
5
The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.说话者和倾听者变量对构音障碍性言语清晰度的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
6
A closer look at transcription intelligibility for speakers with dysarthria: evaluation of scoring paradigms and linguistic errors made by listeners.深入探究构音障碍患者的言语可懂度:评分范式及听众语言错误的评估
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 Aug;15(3):268-77. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/025).
7
Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.视觉信息对构音障碍言语清晰度的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Aug;16(3):222-34. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/027).
8
Dysarthria in Adults With Cerebral Palsy: Clinical Presentation and Impacts on Communication.成人脑瘫患者的构音障碍:临床表现及对沟通的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Apr 1;59(2):216-29. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-15-0086.
9
Implementing speech supplementation strategies: effects on intelligibility and speech rate of individuals with chronic severe dysarthria.实施言语补充策略:对慢性重度构音障碍患者可懂度和语速的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Apr;46(2):462-74.
10
Relationship between kinematics, F2 slope and speech intelligibility in dysarthria due to cerebral palsy.脑瘫所致构音障碍中运动学、F2斜率与言语清晰度之间的关系。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Sep;26(9):806-22. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.706686.