Department of Health, Functional Capacity and Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 28;11:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-138.
Psychological factors associated with low social status have been proposed as one possible explanation for the socio-economic gradient in health. The aim of this study is to explore whether different indicators of psychological distress contribute to socio-economic differences in cause-specific mortality.
The data source is a nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey, "Health Behaviour and Health among the Finnish Adult Population" (AVTK). The survey results were linked with socio-economic register data from Statistics Finland (from the years 1979-2002) and mortality follow-up data up to 2006 from the Finnish National Cause of Death Register. The data included 32,451 men and 35,420 women (response rate 73.5%). Self-reported measures of depression, insomnia and stress were used as indicators of psychological distress. Socio-economic factors included education, employment status and household income. Mortality data consisted of unnatural causes of death (suicide, accidents and violence, and alcohol-related mortality) and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios were calculated using the Cox regression model.
In unnatural mortality, psychological distress accounted for some of the employment status (11-31%) and income level (4-16%) differences among both men and women, and for the differences related to the educational level (5-12%) among men; the educational level was associated statistically significantly with unnatural mortality only among men. Psychological distress had minor or no contribution to socio-economic differences in CHD mortality.
Psychological distress partly accounted for socio-economic disparities in unnatural mortality. Further studies are needed to explore the role and mechanisms of psychological distress associated with socio-economic differences in cause-specific mortality.
与社会地位较低相关的心理因素被认为是健康的社会经济梯度的一个可能解释。本研究的目的是探讨不同的心理困扰指标是否会导致特定原因死亡率的社会经济差异。
数据来源是一项具有全国代表性的重复横断面调查,名为“芬兰成人健康行为和健康调查”(AVTK)。该调查结果与来自芬兰统计局的社会经济登记数据(1979-2002 年)以及芬兰国家死因登记处的死亡率随访数据(截至 2006 年)相关联。数据包括 32451 名男性和 35420 名女性(应答率为 73.5%)。自我报告的抑郁、失眠和压力指标被用作心理困扰的指标。社会经济因素包括教育程度、就业状况和家庭收入。死亡率数据包括非自然原因死亡(自杀、意外和暴力以及与酒精相关的死亡率)和冠心病(CHD)死亡率。使用 Cox 回归模型计算了调整后的危险比。
在非自然死亡方面,心理困扰解释了男性和女性的就业状况(11-31%)和收入水平(4-16%)差异的一部分,以及与男性教育程度(5-12%)相关的差异;教育程度仅与男性的非自然死亡率相关,具有统计学意义。心理困扰对 CHD 死亡率的社会经济差异几乎没有或没有贡献。
心理困扰部分解释了非自然死亡的社会经济差异。需要进一步研究探讨与社会经济差异相关的心理困扰在特定原因死亡率中的作用和机制。