Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Aug;48(8):933-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
It is believed that timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia is a pre-condition for improving care for both older adults with dementia and their informal caregivers. However, diagnosing dementia often occurs late in the disease. This means that a significant number of patients with early symptoms of dementia and their informal caregivers may lack appropriate care.
To compare the effects of case management and usual care among community-dwelling older adults with early symptoms of dementia and their primary informal caregivers.
Randomized controlled trial with measurements at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Primary care in West-Friesland, the Netherlands.
99 pairs of community-dwelling older adults with dementia symptoms (defined as abnormal screening for symptoms of dementia) and their primary informal caregivers.
12 months of case management by district nurses for both older adults and informal caregivers versus usual care.
informal caregiver's sense of competence.
caregiver's quality of life, depressive symptoms, and burden, and patient's quality of life. Process measurements: intervention fidelity and caregiver's satisfaction with the quality of case management.
Linear mixed model analyses showed no statistically significant and clinically relevant differences over time between the two groups. The process evaluation revealed that intervention fidelity could have been better. Meanwhile, informal caregivers were satisfied with the quality of case management.
This study shows no benefits of case management for older adults with dementia symptoms and their primary informal caregivers. One possible explanation is that case management, which has been recommended among diagnosed dementia patients, may not be beneficial if offered too early. However, on the other hand, it is possible that: (1) case management will be effective in this group if more fully implemented and adapted or aimed at informal caregivers who experience more severe distress and problems; (2) case management is beneficial but that it is not seen in the timeframe studied; (3) case management might have undetected small benefits. This has to be established. Trial registration ISCRTN83135728.
人们认为,及时识别和诊断痴呆症是改善痴呆症老年患者及其非正式照护者护理的前提条件。然而,痴呆症的诊断往往发生在疾病晚期。这意味着,大量有痴呆症早期症状的患者及其非正式照护者可能缺乏适当的护理。
比较个案管理与常规护理对有痴呆症早期症状的社区居住老年人及其主要非正式照护者的效果。
基线和 6 个月及 12 个月时进行测量的随机对照试验。
荷兰西弗里斯兰的初级保健。
99 对有痴呆症症状的社区居住老年人及其主要非正式照护者(定义为痴呆症症状异常筛查)。
对老年人和非正式照护者进行 12 个月的地区护士个案管理,与常规护理相比。
非正式照护者的能力感。
照护者的生活质量、抑郁症状和负担,以及患者的生活质量。过程测量:干预一致性和照护者对个案管理质量的满意度。
线性混合模型分析显示,两组在时间上无统计学显著和临床相关差异。过程评估显示,干预一致性可能会更好。同时,非正式照护者对个案管理的质量感到满意。
本研究表明,对有痴呆症症状的老年人及其主要非正式照护者进行个案管理没有益处。一种可能的解释是,如果提供得过早,个案管理(已被推荐用于诊断出的痴呆症患者)可能不会带来益处。然而,另一方面,也有可能:(1)如果更充分地实施和调整个案管理,或者针对经历更严重困扰和问题的非正式照护者,个案管理将对这一群体有效;(2)个案管理是有益的,但在研究的时间范围内没有看到;(3)个案管理可能有未被发现的小益处。这一点有待确定。试验注册 ISCRTN83135728。