Dadich Ann, Lan Angela, Shanmugarajan Suhasini, Childs Sarah, Alford Jennifer, Chróinín Danielle Ní
School of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1588-1597. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19371. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
International recognition of the increasing importance of care for older people has seen growing interest in models of care for older people. Yet there is limited information about the scope and breadth of models of care for older people. This article clarifies what is known about models of care for older people by summarizing relevant publications, describing the models depicted in these publications, and synthesizing the outcomes and impact presented in the publications.
A scoping review was conducted that involved searching multiple databases to identify relevant publications, published in English, which presented a model of care for older people-specifically, non-Indigenous people aged ≥ 65 years and/or Indigenous people aged ≥ 50 years; and included evidence, broadly defined, about the utility or otherwise of the model. Commentaries, narrative letters, editorials, and reviews were excluded.
From 21,767 publications, 276 were deemed relevant. From these, four key findings are apparent. First, models of care for older people are understood in disparate ways and are typically devoid of clear stepwise guidance. Second, most of the publications reported on a multidisciplinary approach. Third, they generally failed to involve carers. Fourth, very few publications reported on studies conducted in a rural area, and none involved Indigenous people.
Given the heterogeneity and breadth of models of care for older people, further research is needed to establish: a definition of a model of care for older people; reporting standards; the factors that help or hinder their effectiveness; how to ensure carer involvement; and how to adapt models of care for older people for priority populations.
国际上日益认识到老年人护理的重要性,这使得人们对老年人护理模式的兴趣与日俱增。然而,关于老年人护理模式的范围和广度的信息有限。本文通过总结相关出版物、描述这些出版物中所描绘的模式以及综合出版物中呈现的结果和影响,来阐明关于老年人护理模式的已知情况。
进行了一项范围综述,包括搜索多个数据库以识别以英文发表的相关出版物,这些出版物呈现了针对老年人的护理模式——具体而言,是针对年龄≥65岁的非原住民和/或年龄≥50岁的原住民;并且包括广义定义的关于该模式效用或其他方面的证据。评论、叙述性信函、社论和综述被排除在外。
从21,767篇出版物中,有276篇被认为相关。从这些文献中可以明显看出四个关键发现。第一,对老年人护理模式的理解各不相同,而且通常缺乏清晰的逐步指导。第二,大多数出版物报道的是多学科方法。第三,它们普遍未让护理人员参与。第四,很少有出版物报道在农村地区进行的研究,且没有涉及原住民的研究。
鉴于老年人护理模式的异质性和广度,需要进一步开展研究以确定:老年人护理模式的定义;报告标准;有助于或阻碍其有效性的因素;如何确保护理人员的参与;以及如何针对优先人群调整老年人护理模式。