Wolf Michael S, Curtis Laura M, Waite Katherine, Bailey Stacy Cooper, Hedlund Laurie A, Davis Terry C, Shrank William H, Parker Ruth M, Wood Alastair J J
Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Feb 28;171(4):300-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.39.
There is considerable variability in the manner in which prescriptions are written by physicians and transcribed by pharmacists, resulting in patient misunderstanding of label instructions. A universal medication schedule was recently proposed for standardizing prescribing practices to 4 daily time intervals, thereby helping patients simplify and safely use complex prescription regimens. We investigated whether patients consolidate their medications or whether there is evidence of unnecessary regimen complexity that would support standardization.
Structured interviews were conducted with 464 adults (age range, 55-74 years) who were receiving care either at an academic general medicine practice or at 1 of 3 federally qualified health centers in Chicago, Illinois. Participants were given a hypothetical, 7-drug medication regimen and asked to demonstrate how and when they would take all of the medications in a 24-hour period. The regimen could be consolidated into 4 dosing episodes per day. The primary outcome was the number of times per day that individuals would take medication. Root causes for patients complicating the regimen (>4 times a day) were examined.
Participants on average identified 6 times (SD, 1.8 times; range, 3-14 times) in 24 hours to take the 7 drugs. One-third of the participants (29.3%) dosed their medications 7 or more times per day, while only 14.9% organized the regimen into 4 or fewer times a day. In multivariable analysis, low literacy was an independent predictor of more times per day for dosing the regimen (β = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-1.22; P = .02). Instructions for 2 of the drugs were identical, yet 31.0% of the participants did not take these medications at the same time. Another set of drugs had similar instructions, with the primary exception of 1 drug having the added instruction to take "with food and water." Half of the participants (49.5%) took these medications at different times. When the medications had variable expressions of the same dose frequency (eg, "every 12 hours" vs "twice daily"), 79.0% of the participants did not consolidate the medications.
Many patients, especially those with limited literacy, do not consolidate prescription regimens in the most efficient manner, which could impede adherence. Standardized instructions proposed with the universal medication schedule and other task-centered strategies could potentially help patients routinely organize and take medication regimens.
医生开处方和药剂师转录处方的方式存在很大差异,这导致患者对标签说明产生误解。最近有人提出了一种通用用药时间表,旨在将处方做法标准化为4个每日时间间隔,从而帮助患者简化并安全使用复杂的处方方案。我们调查了患者是否会整合他们的药物,或者是否有证据表明存在不必要的方案复杂性,从而支持标准化。
对464名成年人(年龄范围为55 - 74岁)进行了结构化访谈,这些成年人在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一家学术综合内科诊所或3家联邦合格健康中心之一接受治疗。参与者被给予一个假设的7种药物的用药方案,并被要求演示他们在24小时内将如何以及何时服用所有药物。该方案可以整合为每天4次给药。主要结果是个体每天服药的次数。研究了患者使方案复杂化(每天>4次)的根本原因。
参与者平均确定在24小时内有6次(标准差为1.8次;范围为3 - 14次)服用这7种药物。三分之一的参与者(29.3%)每天给药7次或更多次,而只有14.9%的参与者将方案安排为每天4次或更少次。在多变量分析中,低文化程度是方案每天给药次数更多的独立预测因素(β = 0.67;95%置信区间为0.12 - 1.22;P = 0.02)。其中2种药物的说明相同,但31.0%的参与者没有同时服用这些药物。另一组药物有相似的说明,主要例外是1种药物有额外的说明“与食物和水一起服用”。一半的参与者(49.5%)在不同时间服用这些药物。当药物的相同剂量频率有不同表述时(例如,“每12小时”与“每日两次”),79.0%的参与者没有整合这些药物。
许多患者,尤其是文化程度有限的患者,没有以最有效的方式整合处方方案,这可能会妨碍依从性。通用用药时间表提出的标准化说明和其他以任务为中心的策略可能会潜在地帮助患者常规地安排和服用用药方案。