Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1792-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821201a5.
Procalcitonin may be associated with reduced antibiotic usage compared to usual care. However, individual randomized controlled trials testing this hypothesis were too small to rule out harm, and the full cost-benefit of this strategy has not been evaluated. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of a procalcitonin-guided antibiotic strategy on clinical and economic outcomes.
The use of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy.
We searched computerized databases, reference lists of pertinent articles, and personal files. We included randomized controlled trials conducted in the intensive care unit that compared a procalcitonin-guided strategy to usual care and reported on antibiotic utilization and clinically important outcomes. Results were qualitatively and quantitatively summarized. On the basis of no effect in hospital mortality or hospital length of stay, a cost or cost-minimization analysis was conducted using the costs of procalcitonin testing and antibiotic acquisition and administration. Costs were determined from the literature and are reported in 2009 Canadian dollars. Five articles met the inclusion criteria. Procalcitonin-guided strategies were associated with a significant reduction in antibiotic use (weighted mean difference -2.14 days, 95% confidence interval -2.51 to -1.78, p < .00001). No effect was seen of a procalcitonin-guided strategy on hospital mortality (risk ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.30, p = .59; risk difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.04 to +0.07, p = .61) and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. The cost model revealed that, for the base case scenario (daily price of procalcitonin Can$49.42, 6 days of procalcitonin measurement, and 2-day difference in antibiotic treatment between procalcitonin-guided therapy and usual care), the point at which the cost of testing equals the cost of antibiotics saved is when daily antibiotics cost Can$148.26 (ranging between Can$59.30 and Can$296.52 on the basis of different assumptions in sensitivity analyses).
Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy is associated with a reduction in antibiotic usage that, under certain assumptions, may reduce overall costs of care. However, the overall estimate cannot rule out a 7% increase in hospital mortality.
降钙素原指导抗生素治疗可能会减少抗生素的使用,优于常规治疗。然而,个别测试这一假说的随机对照试验规模太小,无法排除危害,而且这种策略的全部成本效益尚未得到评估。本分析的目的是评估降钙素原指导抗生素策略对临床和经济结果的影响。
降钙素原指导抗生素治疗的使用。
我们检索了计算机数据库、相关文章的参考文献列表和个人文件。我们纳入了在重症监护病房进行的比较降钙素原指导策略与常规治疗并报告抗生素使用和临床重要结局的随机对照试验。结果进行了定性和定量总结。基于住院死亡率或住院时间无差异,根据降钙素原检测和抗生素获取和管理的成本进行了成本或成本最小化分析。成本来自文献,以 2009 加元报告。五篇文章符合纳入标准。降钙素原指导策略与抗生素使用显著减少相关(加权平均差异 -2.14 天,95%置信区间 -2.51 至 -1.78,p <.00001)。降钙素原指导策略对住院死亡率无影响(风险比 1.06,95%置信区间 0.86-1.30,p =.59;风险差异 0.01,95%置信区间 -0.04 至 +0.07,p =.61)和重症监护病房和住院时间。成本模型显示,对于基本情况(降钙素原的每日价格为 49.42 加元,降钙素原测量 6 天,降钙素原指导治疗与常规治疗之间抗生素治疗差异 2 天),当每天抗生素成本为 148.26 加元时,检测成本等于抗生素节省成本(根据敏感性分析中的不同假设,范围在 59.30 加元至 296.52 加元之间)。
降钙素原指导抗生素治疗与抗生素使用减少相关,在某些假设下,可能会降低整体医疗成本。然而,总体估计不能排除住院死亡率增加 7%的可能性。