Suppr超能文献

阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症(PNH):流式细胞术分析网织红细胞在诊断和连续监测中的更高灵敏度和有效性。

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH): higher sensitivity and validity in diagnosis and serial monitoring by flow cytometric analysis of reticulocytes.

机构信息

DRK-Blood Donor Service, Baden-Württemberg-Hessia, Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2011 Aug;90(8):887-99. doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1177-4. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

Abstract

Flow cytometric analysis of GPI-anchored proteins (GPI-AP) is the gold standard for diagnosis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Due to therapy options and the relevance of GPI-deficient clones for prognosis in aplastic anaemia detection of PNH is gaining importance. However, no generally accepted standard has been established. This study analysed the usefulness of a flow cytometric panel with CD58, CD59 on reticulocytes and erythrocytes, CD24/CD66b and CD16, FLAER on granulocytes and CD14, and CD48 on monocytes. Actual cut-off (mean + 2 SD) for GPI-deficient cells was established in healthy blood donors. We studied 1,296 flow cytometric results of 803 patients. Serial monitoring was analysed during a median follow-up of 1,039 days in 155 patients. Of all, 22% and 48% of 155 follow-up patients. showed significant GPI-AP-deficiency at time of initial analyses. During follow-up in 9%, a new PNH diagnosis, and in 28%, a significant change of size or lineage involvement was demonstrated. Highly significant correlations for GPI-AP deficiency were found within one cell lineage (r² = 0.61-0.95, p < 0.0001) and between the different cell lineages (r² = 0.49-0.88, p < 0.0001). Especially for detection of small GPI-deficient populations, reticulocytes and monocytes proved to be sensitive diagnostic tools. Our data showed superiority of reticulocyte analyses compared with erythrocyte analyses due to transfusion and hemolysis independency especially in cases with small GPI-deficient populations. In conclusion, a screening panel of at least two different GPI-AP markers on granulocytes, erythrocytes, and reticulocytes provides a simple and rapid method to detect even small GPI-deficient populations. Among the markers in our panel, CD58 and CD59 on reticulocytes, CD24/66b, and eventually FLAER on granulocytes as well as CD14 on monocytes were most effective for flow cytometric diagnosis of GPI deficiency.

摘要

用流式细胞术分析糖基磷脂酰肌醇锚定蛋白(GPI-AP)是诊断阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症(PNH)的金标准。由于治疗选择和 GPI 缺陷克隆与再生障碍性贫血预后的相关性,PNH 的检测变得越来越重要。然而,目前还没有建立普遍接受的标准。本研究分析了流式细胞术检测 GPI 缺陷细胞的 panel 的有效性,该 panel 包括红细胞和网织红细胞上的 CD58、CD59,粒细胞上的 CD24/CD66b 和 CD16、FLAER,单核细胞上的 CD14 和 CD48。在健康献血者中建立了实际的 GPI 缺陷细胞截断值(平均值+2 个标准差)。我们研究了 803 例患者的 1296 份流式细胞术结果。在 155 例患者的中位随访 1039 天期间分析了连续监测结果。所有患者中,22%和 48%的患者在初始分析时表现出明显的 GPI-AP 缺陷。在随访中,9%的患者新诊断为 PNH,28%的患者显示大小或谱系受累的显著变化。在同一细胞谱系内(r²=0.61-0.95,p<0.0001)和不同细胞谱系之间(r²=0.49-0.88,p<0.0001)均发现 GPI-AP 缺陷高度相关。网织红细胞和单核细胞被证明是检测小 GPI 缺陷群体的敏感诊断工具。与红细胞分析相比,我们的数据显示网织红细胞分析具有优势,因为其不受输血和溶血的影响,尤其是在小 GPI 缺陷群体中。总之,至少在粒细胞、红细胞和网织红细胞上使用两种不同的 GPI-AP 标志物的筛选 panel 提供了一种简单快速的方法来检测甚至小的 GPI 缺陷群体。在我们的 panel 中,网织红细胞上的 CD58 和 CD59、CD24/66b,以及粒细胞上的 FLAER 和单核细胞上的 CD14 是流式细胞术诊断 GPI 缺陷最有效的标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2877/3132386/ae541f38a1c0/277_2011_1177_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验