Goldberg T E, Saint-Cyr J A, Weinberger D R
Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, NIMH Neuroscience Center at St. Elizabeths, Washington, DC 20032.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1990 Spring;2(2):165-73. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2.2.165.
Two versions of the Tower of Hanoi task were used to investigate different components of learning and problem solving in schizophrenia. Prior studies have suggested that a three-disk version (Tower 3), which involves primarily problem-solving abilities and planning, is preferentially sensitive to frontal lobe lesions and that the more difficult four-disk version (Tower 4), which involves "learning by doing," is sensitive to basal ganglia disease. Schizophrenic patients performed significantly worse than normal subjects on Tower 3 and Tower 4. However, they performed at least as well relatively on Tower 4 as on Tower 3, indicating that level of difficulty per se does not account for their poor performance on these tasks. Moreover, they eventually attained perfect or near-perfect performance after four days of repeated administration. Their relatively stronger performance on Tower 4 may have reflected an ability to acquire a procedure and, as such, suggests greater preservation of basal ganglia function than of prefrontal function.
使用汉诺塔任务的两个版本来研究精神分裂症患者学习和解决问题的不同组成部分。先前的研究表明,主要涉及解决问题能力和规划的三盘版本(汉诺塔3)对额叶病变更为敏感,而难度更大的四盘版本(汉诺塔4)涉及“边做边学”,对基底神经节疾病敏感。精神分裂症患者在汉诺塔3和汉诺塔4上的表现明显比正常受试者差。然而,他们在汉诺塔4上的相对表现至少与在汉诺塔3上一样好,这表明难度本身并不能解释他们在这些任务上的不佳表现。此外,在重复进行四天后,他们最终达到了完美或接近完美的表现。他们在汉诺塔4上相对较强的表现可能反映了一种掌握程序的能力,因此表明基底神经节功能比前额叶功能得到了更好的保留。