Suppr超能文献

戒烟过程中的无进展情况:是什么让人们难以自我改变?

Nonprogressing profiles in smoking cessation: what keeps people refractory to self-change?

作者信息

Fitzgerald T E, Prochaska J O

机构信息

University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881-0808.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse. 1990;2(1):87-105. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(05)80048-3.

Abstract

A 2-year cross-sequential analysis of informal self-change efforts at smoking cessation evaluated the use of coping operations and the mediation of cognitive judgments among four composite profiles. Subjects (N = 544) were grouped by stage of readiness to change (contemplation, action, relapse, and maintenance) and assessed every 6 months on 10 change processes, self-efficacy, and the decisional balance between the "pros" and "cons" of smoking. Two change status profiles, contemplation to maintenance, and relapse to maintenance, were selected as exemplars of optimal linear progress; two others, chronic contemplation and chronic relapse, illustrated nonprogressing patterns in which subjects remained stuck in the same stage for 2 years. Multivariate and univariate ANOVA results indicated that nonprogressing smokers overutilize certain experiential change processes rather than underutilizing behavioral strategies, as was predicted. Implications of these results for specialized self-help interventions are discussed in the context of a comprehensive model of change for the addictive behaviors.

摘要

一项关于戒烟的非正式自我改变努力的为期两年的交叉序列分析,评估了四种复合概况中应对操作的使用情况以及认知判断的中介作用。受试者(N = 544)按改变准备阶段(沉思、行动、复发和维持)分组,并每6个月评估一次10个改变过程、自我效能感以及吸烟“利弊”之间的决策平衡。选择两种改变状态概况,即从沉思到维持以及从复发到维持,作为最佳线性进展的范例;另外两种,即慢性沉思和慢性复发,则说明了非进展模式,即受试者在同一阶段停滞两年。多变量和单变量方差分析结果表明,与预测的相反,无进展的吸烟者过度使用某些经验性改变过程,而不是未充分使用行为策略。在成瘾行为改变的综合模型背景下讨论了这些结果对专门自助干预措施的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验