Community Dentistry and Oral Public Health, Dental School, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;39(5):416-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00610.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
To explore the long-term effects of the implementation of an oral hygiene protocol in nursing homes.
Out of 14 nursing homes (Flanders) seven nursing homes were randomly allocated to the intervention group and confirmed to implement an 'oral hygiene protocol'. The remaining nursing homes (the control group) continued to perform oral hygiene as usual. Oral hygiene levels were scored and factors related to plaque levels were recorded. Mixed model analysis with random institution effect, were performed to explore differences in oral hygiene levels owing to the intervention, and the predictive value of explanatory variables.
At baseline, no significant differences were found between plaque levels in both study groups. In an unadjusted analysis, different effects were observed on denture and dental plaque. The lowest denture plaque levels were found 2 years after the start of the study, while the lowest dental plaque levels were found at the end of the study. The effect of the intervention could not be confirmed in an adjusted mixed model, where significant indicators for dental plaque were resident's dependency (P<0.01) and presence of mouth rinse (P<0.01). Capacity of the nursing home (P<0.05) and the presence of toothpaste (P<0.01) were dominant influencing factors for denture plaque.
After 5 years of implementation obtained plaque levels were unsatisfactory. A lot of uncertainties remained on the impact of characteristics of individual nursing homes. Obtaining adequate oral hygiene levels in nursing homes remain an important ongoing challenge and needs further research.
探索在养老院实施口腔卫生方案的长期效果。
在 14 家养老院(佛兰德斯)中,7 家养老院被随机分配到干预组,并确认实施“口腔卫生方案”。其余养老院(对照组)继续按照常规进行口腔卫生护理。对口腔卫生水平进行评分,并记录与菌斑水平相关的因素。采用具有随机机构效应的混合模型分析,探讨干预对口腔卫生水平的影响以及解释变量的预测价值。
在基线时,两组研究的菌斑水平没有显著差异。在未调整的分析中,义齿和牙齿菌斑的效果不同。在研究开始后 2 年发现义齿菌斑水平最低,而在研究结束时发现牙齿菌斑水平最低。在调整后的混合模型中,干预的效果无法得到证实,具有显著意义的牙齿菌斑指标是居民的依赖性(P<0.01)和使用漱口液(P<0.01)。养老院的能力(P<0.05)和牙膏的存在(P<0.01)是义齿菌斑的主要影响因素。
实施 5 年后的菌斑水平仍不理想。养老院个体特征的影响存在许多不确定性。在养老院获得足够的口腔卫生水平仍然是一个重要的持续挑战,需要进一步研究。