Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Mar;10(3):M110.004374. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.004374.
In quantitative proteomics work, the differences in expression of many separate proteins are routinely examined to test for significant differences between treatments. This leads to the multiple hypothesis testing problem: when many separate tests are performed many will be significant by chance and be false positive results. Statistical methods such as the false discovery rate method that deal with this problem have been disseminated for more than one decade. However a survey of proteomics journals shows that such tests are not widely implemented in one commonly used technique, quantitative proteomics using two-dimensional electrophoresis. We outline a selection of multiple hypothesis testing methods, including some that are well known and some lesser known, and present a simple strategy for their use by the experimental scientist in quantitative proteomics work generally. The strategy focuses on the desirability of simultaneous use of several different methods, the choice and emphasis dependent on research priorities and the results in hand. This approach is demonstrated using case scenarios with experimental and simulated model data.
在定量蛋白质组学工作中,通常会检查许多单独蛋白质的表达差异,以测试处理之间是否存在显着差异。这导致了多重假设检验问题:当进行许多单独的检验时,许多检验会因偶然而变得显着,并且是假阳性结果。十年来,已经传播了处理此问题的统计方法,例如错误发现率方法。但是,对蛋白质组学杂志的调查表明,在一种常用技术(使用二维电泳的定量蛋白质组学)中,并未广泛实施此类测试。我们概述了多种假设检验方法,包括一些众所周知的方法和一些鲜为人知的方法,并为定量蛋白质组学工作中的实验科学家提供了一种简单的使用策略。该策略侧重于同时使用几种不同方法的可取性,选择和重点取决于研究重点和手头的结果。使用具有实验和模拟模型数据的案例场景演示了该方法。