Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):203-12.
The use of Evaluation Scales in ABI is necessary for measure of outcome, but not always they are used as predictor factors for rehabilitation processes and organization.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of an inpatient rehabilitation program for patients with traumatic brain injury through the use of selected indicators and to identify predictive factors for functional outcome.
This was a retrospective database analysis.
Patients admitted to an Intensive Rehabilitation Unit as inpatient (Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona).
The population included patients with traumatic brain injury.
The study enrolled 175 patients admitted to an Intensive Rehabilitation Unit between 2004 and 2007. Data collected included demographic characteristics, first 24-hours worst GCS, length of acute and rehabilitative stay at admission and discharge FIM, DRS, LCF and GOS.
There was a statistically significant recovery over the course of admission for all assessment tools (P<0.000). When patients were subdivided on the basis of admission DRS categories a linear correlation among variables could be observed, with most disabled patients showing the longest acute and rehabilitation stays and the lowest functional gains. Within each DRS category age appeared to affect improvement (P<0.005) while final outcome was influenced not only by age but also by initial functional status (P<0.000) and time from injury to admission (P<0.004). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Systematic data collection in intensive rehabilitation is of great importance to monitor recovery and plan appropriate programs on the basis of admission functional status.
在评估 ABI 时,使用评估量表对于衡量结果是必要的,但它们并不总是作为康复过程和组织的预测因素。
本研究旨在通过使用选定的指标评估创伤性脑损伤患者住院康复计划的有效性和效率,并确定功能结局的预测因素。
这是一项回顾性数据库分析。
入住强化康复病房的患者(Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria 医院,Negrar-Verona)。
纳入人群为创伤性脑损伤患者。
本研究纳入了 2004 年至 2007 年间入住强化康复病房的 175 名患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、首次 24 小时最差 GCS、入院和出院时急性和康复期的长度、入院和出院时的 FIM、DRS、LCF 和 GOS。
所有评估工具在住院期间均有显著恢复(P<0.000)。当根据入院 DRS 类别对患者进行细分时,可以观察到变量之间存在线性相关性,最残疾的患者表现出最长的急性和康复期,以及最低的功能增益。在每个 DRS 类别中,年龄似乎会影响改善(P<0.005),而最终结局不仅受年龄影响,还受初始功能状态(P<0.000)和受伤至入院时间(P<0.004)影响。
强化康复中系统的数据收集对于监测恢复情况并根据入院时的功能状态制定适当的计划非常重要。