Catholic University of Louvain, Institute of Psychological Sciences, 10, Place Cardinal Mercier, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1492-505. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
This study compares self-regulation in 29 children with intellectual disability and 30 typically developing children, who solved tasks using physical materials or computers. Their cognitive, linguistic levels were assessed in order to match the children of both groups. In the presence of their mothers and fathers, the children were asked to perform eight tasks presented using two types of medium (physical materials and computer). Performance and task completion time were recorded. Seven self-regulated strategies were analyzed: identification of objective, planning, self-attention, self-motivation, joint attention, behaviour regulation and self-evaluation. Children in the two groups did not differ in their self-regulation, and in each group, their chronological age had no significant effect on their self-regulation. However, whatever the medium used, their mental age had a significant effect on their overall self-regulation and on six self-regulated strategies: identification of objective, planning, self-attention, self-motivation, behaviour regulation, and self-evaluation. A positive link between overall self-regulation and language abilities was only obtained in the group of typical developers. In addition, although no significant effect of the medium on overall self-regulation was observed in each group, an effect of the type of medium was obtained concerning three specific self-regulated strategies, though not in the same direction: self-attention and self-evaluation are better with the computer than with physical materials, whereas joint attention is better with physical materials than with the computer. In both groups, overall self-regulation, whatever the medium, correlated positively and highly significantly with performance in different tasks (but not with completion time). In each group, variable correlational patterns were obtained between specific self-regulated strategies and performance in each task with each medium: inter-task variability of efficiency of distinct strategies was observed.
本研究比较了 29 名智障儿童和 30 名正常发展儿童在使用物理材料或计算机解决任务时的自我调节能力。为了匹配两组儿童,评估了他们的认知和语言水平。在母亲和父亲的陪同下,要求孩子们使用两种媒介(物理材料和计算机)完成八项任务。记录了表现和任务完成时间。分析了七种自我调节策略:目标识别、计划、自我注意、自我激励、共同注意、行为调节和自我评价。两组儿童的自我调节能力没有差异,而且在每个组中,他们的实际年龄对自我调节能力没有显著影响。然而,无论使用哪种媒介,他们的心理年龄对他们的整体自我调节能力和六种自我调节策略都有显著影响:目标识别、计划、自我注意、自我激励、行为调节和自我评价。只有在正常发展组中,整体自我调节能力与语言能力之间才存在正相关关系。此外,尽管在每个组中都没有观察到媒介对整体自我调节能力的显著影响,但在三个特定的自我调节策略方面,却观察到了媒介类型的影响,尽管方向不同:自我注意和自我评价在计算机上比在物理材料上更好,而共同注意在物理材料上比在计算机上更好。在两组中,无论使用哪种媒介,整体自我调节能力与不同任务的表现都呈正相关且高度显著(但与完成时间无关)。在每组中,都在特定的自我调节策略和每个任务与每个媒介之间的表现之间获得了可变的相关模式:观察到了不同策略的效率的任务间可变性。