Catholic University of Louvain, Institute of Psychological Sciences, Place Cardinal Mercier, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve,
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):449-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
This study compared mothers and fathers' regulation with respect to 29 children with intellectual disability (ID) and 30 typically developing (TD) children, matched on their mental age (MA), as they solved eight tasks using physical materials and computers. Seven parents' regulatory strategies were coded as they supported their child's identification of the objective, planning, attention, motivation, joint attention, behaviour regulation and evaluation. Children's performance was scored. Regulation by the parents of the two groups did not differ significantly, regardless of the medium, except that the degree of parental regulation of the child's behaviour was greater in the ID group than in the TD group. In tasks involving the computer, we observed a higher degree of regulation of children's planning and a lower degree of regulation of their evaluation for the two groups. The parents displayed significantly less regulation with respect to the children with the highest MA than towards the children with the lowest MA, in each group. There was a significant interaction effect of medium and children's MA on overall parents' regulation and on their support of identification of objective and of planning. Most parental strategies were negatively linked with ID and TD children's performance in tasks. In both groups, with control for MA, parental support with the identification of the objective, with planning and with attention was negatively linked to the corresponding self-regulatory strategies of the children with each medium; however, parents' joint attention was positively linked with children's joint attention.
本研究比较了智力障碍(ID)儿童和 30 名典型发育(TD)儿童的母亲和父亲的调节情况,这些儿童按其心理年龄(MA)与 29 名 ID 儿童和 30 名 TD 儿童相匹配,他们使用物理材料和计算机解决了八项任务。在支持孩子识别目标、规划、注意力、动机、共同注意力、行为调节和评估时,对 7 位家长的 7 种调节策略进行了编码。对孩子表现进行了评分。无论使用哪种媒介,两组父母的调节都没有显著差异,除了 ID 组中父母对孩子行为的调节程度大于 TD 组。在涉及计算机的任务中,我们观察到两组孩子的规划调节程度更高,评估调节程度更低。在每组中,与 MA 最低的孩子相比,父母对 MA 最高的孩子的调节明显减少。在总体父母调节以及对目标识别和规划的支持方面,媒介和孩子的 MA 之间存在显著的交互效应。大多数父母策略与 ID 和 TD 儿童在任务中的表现呈负相关。在两组中,在控制 MA 的情况下,父母对目标识别、规划和注意力的支持与每个媒介中孩子的相应自我调节策略呈负相关;然而,父母的共同注意力与孩子的共同注意力呈正相关。