Institute of Agro-Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Mar;12(3):226-46. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0900264.
Winegrape is an important perennial crop in California, USA. Each year California winegrape farming consumes about 20 million kilograms of pesticides that have been a pollutant source to the fresh water systems of the state. The variation of pesticide use among winegrape growers has been significant. It has been observed that some growers have developed effective ways to reduce pesticide use, yet control pests efficiently to ensure harvest. Identification of the growers with low and high pesticide use is very helpful to extension programs that aim on reducing pesticide environmental risk. In this study, an index approach is proposed to quantitatively measure pesticide use intensity at grower level. An integrated pesticide use index is developed by taking pesticide quantity and toxicity into account. An additive formula and a multiplying formula were used to calculate the pesticide use index, i.e., PUI and PUIM. It was found that both PUI and PUIM were capable of identifying the low and high pesticide users while PUI was slightly more conservative than PUIM. All pesticides used in California winegrape farming were taken into account for calculating the indices. Madera County, one of the largest winegrape producers in California, was taken as an example to test the proposed approach. In year 2000, among the total 208 winegrape growers, 28 with PUI≤10 and 34 with 10<PUI≤20 were identified as low pesticide users who were characterized with both low quantity and low toxicity of pesticide use. Most of the growers had small-sized vineyards, i.e., one field and small planted areas. Furthermore, they had very low pesticide use intensity, used only 1-2 types of pesticides (mainly fungicides), applied few pesticides (1-3 only), and emphasized the use of low toxicity compounds. Meanwhile, 19 growers with PUI>60, identified as high pesticide users, had large-sized vineyards, i.e., more fields and large planted areas. They used all types of pesticides and many compounds, which indicated that their pest controls heavily depended on pesticides rather than on-farm management. Through the case study, the proposed approach proved to be useful for analyzing the growers' pesticide use intensities and interpreting their pesticide use behaviors, which led to a new start point for further investigation of searching ways to reduce pesticide environmental risk.
葡萄是美国加利福尼亚州一种重要的多年生作物。每年加利福尼亚州的葡萄种植业要消耗约 2000 万公斤的农药,这些农药已经成为该州淡水系统的污染来源。葡萄种植者之间的农药使用差异很大。已经观察到,一些种植者已经开发出了有效减少农药使用量而又能有效控制害虫以确保收获的方法。识别低农药使用量和高农药使用量的种植者对于旨在降低农药环境风险的推广计划非常有帮助。在本研究中,提出了一种指数方法来定量测量种植者层面的农药使用强度。通过考虑农药数量和毒性,开发了一个综合的农药使用指数。使用加和公式和乘法公式来计算农药使用指数,即 PUI 和 PUIM。结果表明,PUI 和 PUIM 都能够识别低农药使用量和高农药使用量的种植者,而 PUI 比 PUIM 略为保守。加利福尼亚州所有用于葡萄种植的农药都被用来计算这些指数。默塞德县是加利福尼亚州最大的葡萄种植区之一,被选为测试所提出方法的示例。在 2000 年,在总共 208 个葡萄种植者中,有 28 个 PUI≤10 和 34 个 10<PUI≤20 的种植者被确定为低农药使用量的种植者,他们的特点是农药使用量低且毒性低。大多数种植者拥有小型葡萄园,即一个葡萄园和小种植面积。此外,他们的农药使用强度非常低,只使用 1-2 种农药(主要是杀菌剂),只使用很少的农药(仅 1-3 种),并且强调使用低毒性化合物。同时,有 19 个 PUI>60 的种植者被确定为高农药使用量的种植者,他们拥有大型葡萄园,即更多的葡萄园和大面积种植。他们使用所有类型的农药和许多化合物,这表明他们的害虫防治严重依赖于农药,而不是农场管理。通过案例研究,所提出的方法被证明可用于分析种植者的农药使用强度并解释他们的农药使用行为,这为进一步探索降低农药环境风险的方法提供了一个新的起点。