• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An index method to evaluate growers' pesticide use for identifying on-farm innovations and effective alternative pest management strategies: a case study of winegrape in Madera County, California.一种评估种植者农药使用情况的指标方法,用于识别农场创新和有效替代害虫管理策略:以加利福尼亚州马德拉县的酿酒葡萄为例。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Mar;12(3):226-46. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0900264.
2
Sustainability partnerships and viticulture management in California.加利福尼亚的可持续发展伙伴关系与葡萄栽培管理。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
PURE: a web-based decision support system to evaluate pesticide environmental risk for sustainable pest management practices in California.PURE:一个基于网络的决策支持系统,用于评估加利福尼亚可持续害虫管理实践中农药的环境风险。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Aug;82:104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.05.019. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
Costs and effectiveness of on-farm measures to reduce aquatic risks from pesticides in the Netherlands.荷兰农场降低农药对水生环境风险措施的成本与效益
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Dec;70(12):1840-9. doi: 10.1002/ps.3729. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
5
Reduced-risk pest management programs for eastern U.S. peach orchards: effects on arthropod predators, parasitoids, and select pests.美国东部桃果园有害生物综合治理方案的降低风险措施:对节肢动物捕食性天敌、寄生性天敌和部分有害生物的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2014 Jun;107(3):1084-91. doi: 10.1603/ec13441.
6
Spatial and temporal patterns of pesticide use on California almonds and associated risks to the surrounding environment.加利福尼亚州杏仁种植中农药的时空使用模式及其对周边环境的相关风险。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 15;472:517-29. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.022. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
7
Changing patterns in water toxicity associated with current use pesticides in three California agriculture regions.加利福尼亚州三个农业地区当前使用的农药所导致的水毒性变化模式
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Mar;14(2):270-281. doi: 10.1002/ieam.2005. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
History of IPM in California pears--50 years of pesticide use and the transition to biologically intensive IPM.加利福尼亚梨树的有害生物综合治理历史——50 年的农药使用和向生物强化有害生物综合治理的转变。
Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Dec;65(12):1287-92. doi: 10.1002/ps.1865.
9
The case and opportunity for public-supported financial incentives to implement integrated pest management.实施病虫害综合防治的公共支持性财政激励措施的案例与机遇。
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Dec;97(6):1782-9. doi: 10.1093/jee/97.6.1782.
10
Knowledge and perception of cereal farmers and extension agents on fungicide use in northern Ghana.加纳北部谷物种植户和推广员对使用杀菌剂的认知和看法。
Pest Manag Sci. 2024 Sep;80(9):4207-4215. doi: 10.1002/ps.8124. Epub 2024 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A preliminary investigation into the impact of a pesticide combination on human neuronal and glial cell lines in vitro.初步研究了一种农药混合物对体外培养的人神经元和神经胶质细胞系的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042768. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters.北美地表水中莠去津的生态风险评估。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Jan;32(1):10-1. doi: 10.1002/etc.2050.
2
Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments.毒死蜱:北美水生环境中的生态风险评估
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999;160:1-129. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1498-4_1.

一种评估种植者农药使用情况的指标方法,用于识别农场创新和有效替代害虫管理策略:以加利福尼亚州马德拉县的酿酒葡萄为例。

An index method to evaluate growers' pesticide use for identifying on-farm innovations and effective alternative pest management strategies: a case study of winegrape in Madera County, California.

机构信息

Institute of Agro-Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Mar;12(3):226-46. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0900264.

DOI:10.1631/jzus.B0900264
PMID:21370508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3048938/
Abstract

Winegrape is an important perennial crop in California, USA. Each year California winegrape farming consumes about 20 million kilograms of pesticides that have been a pollutant source to the fresh water systems of the state. The variation of pesticide use among winegrape growers has been significant. It has been observed that some growers have developed effective ways to reduce pesticide use, yet control pests efficiently to ensure harvest. Identification of the growers with low and high pesticide use is very helpful to extension programs that aim on reducing pesticide environmental risk. In this study, an index approach is proposed to quantitatively measure pesticide use intensity at grower level. An integrated pesticide use index is developed by taking pesticide quantity and toxicity into account. An additive formula and a multiplying formula were used to calculate the pesticide use index, i.e., PUI and PUIM. It was found that both PUI and PUIM were capable of identifying the low and high pesticide users while PUI was slightly more conservative than PUIM. All pesticides used in California winegrape farming were taken into account for calculating the indices. Madera County, one of the largest winegrape producers in California, was taken as an example to test the proposed approach. In year 2000, among the total 208 winegrape growers, 28 with PUI≤10 and 34 with 10<PUI≤20 were identified as low pesticide users who were characterized with both low quantity and low toxicity of pesticide use. Most of the growers had small-sized vineyards, i.e., one field and small planted areas. Furthermore, they had very low pesticide use intensity, used only 1-2 types of pesticides (mainly fungicides), applied few pesticides (1-3 only), and emphasized the use of low toxicity compounds. Meanwhile, 19 growers with PUI>60, identified as high pesticide users, had large-sized vineyards, i.e., more fields and large planted areas. They used all types of pesticides and many compounds, which indicated that their pest controls heavily depended on pesticides rather than on-farm management. Through the case study, the proposed approach proved to be useful for analyzing the growers' pesticide use intensities and interpreting their pesticide use behaviors, which led to a new start point for further investigation of searching ways to reduce pesticide environmental risk.

摘要

葡萄是美国加利福尼亚州一种重要的多年生作物。每年加利福尼亚州的葡萄种植业要消耗约 2000 万公斤的农药,这些农药已经成为该州淡水系统的污染来源。葡萄种植者之间的农药使用差异很大。已经观察到,一些种植者已经开发出了有效减少农药使用量而又能有效控制害虫以确保收获的方法。识别低农药使用量和高农药使用量的种植者对于旨在降低农药环境风险的推广计划非常有帮助。在本研究中,提出了一种指数方法来定量测量种植者层面的农药使用强度。通过考虑农药数量和毒性,开发了一个综合的农药使用指数。使用加和公式和乘法公式来计算农药使用指数,即 PUI 和 PUIM。结果表明,PUI 和 PUIM 都能够识别低农药使用量和高农药使用量的种植者,而 PUI 比 PUIM 略为保守。加利福尼亚州所有用于葡萄种植的农药都被用来计算这些指数。默塞德县是加利福尼亚州最大的葡萄种植区之一,被选为测试所提出方法的示例。在 2000 年,在总共 208 个葡萄种植者中,有 28 个 PUI≤10 和 34 个 10<PUI≤20 的种植者被确定为低农药使用量的种植者,他们的特点是农药使用量低且毒性低。大多数种植者拥有小型葡萄园,即一个葡萄园和小种植面积。此外,他们的农药使用强度非常低,只使用 1-2 种农药(主要是杀菌剂),只使用很少的农药(仅 1-3 种),并且强调使用低毒性化合物。同时,有 19 个 PUI>60 的种植者被确定为高农药使用量的种植者,他们拥有大型葡萄园,即更多的葡萄园和大面积种植。他们使用所有类型的农药和许多化合物,这表明他们的害虫防治严重依赖于农药,而不是农场管理。通过案例研究,所提出的方法被证明可用于分析种植者的农药使用强度并解释他们的农药使用行为,这为进一步探索降低农药环境风险的方法提供了一个新的起点。