Seike Junichi, Tangoku Akira, Yuasa Yasuhiro, Okitsu Hiroshi, Kawakami Yukikiyo, Sumitomo Masayuki
Department of Thoracic, Endocrine Surgery and Oncology, Institute of Health Biosciences, University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
J Med Invest. 2011 Feb;58(1-2):75-80. doi: 10.2152/jmi.58.75.
Enteral nutrition (EN) is now used more frequently than total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for nutritional support after resection for esophageal cancer. But consensus regarding which type of nutrition should be used does not exist. We studied the effect of TPN and EN on patients' nutritional status and immune function in the immediate postoperative period after esophageal cancer resection.
We enrolled 30 patients (27 men and 3 women) who underwent subtotal esophagectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to TPN or EN group. Either TPN or EN was begun on postoperative day 1. On postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, three endpoints were measured: albumin, C-reactive protein, and Th1/Th2 balance.
All patients completed the study. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 6 patients in the TPN group and 7 patients in the EN group. Albumin, Th1/Th2 balance, and C-reactive protein did not differ between the groups. Th1/Th2 balance was not different regardless of the preoperative treatment or complications.
No differences in immune function, nutritional state, or inflammatory response were seen between patients supported with TPN and those supported with EN. The results of our study suggest that perioperative nutritional support can be safely performed either with TPN or EN.
目前,食管癌切除术后营养支持中,肠内营养(EN)的使用频率高于全胃肠外营养(TPN)。但对于应使用哪种营养类型尚未达成共识。我们研究了TPN和EN对食管癌切除术后即刻患者营养状况和免疫功能的影响。
我们纳入了30例行食管次全切除术的患者(27例男性和3例女性)。患者被随机分配至TPN组或EN组。术后第1天开始给予TPN或EN。在术后第1、3和7天,测量三个指标:白蛋白、C反应蛋白和Th1/Th2平衡。
所有患者均完成研究。TPN组有6例患者发生吻合口漏,EN组有7例患者发生吻合口漏。两组间白蛋白、Th1/Th2平衡和C反应蛋白无差异。无论术前治疗或并发症情况如何,Th1/Th2平衡均无差异。
接受TPN支持的患者与接受EN支持的患者在免疫功能、营养状态或炎症反应方面未见差异。我们的研究结果表明,围手术期营养支持使用TPN或EN均可安全进行。