Folkes Amy, Urquhart Robin, Zitzelsberger Louise, Grunfeld Eva
Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Breast Care (Basel). 2008;3(2):108-113. doi: 10.1159/000121732. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
A series of specific clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were published in Canada in 1998. A primary objective of these 'Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer' was to decrease the variation in breast cancer care across the country. Prior to this, researchers found moderate compliance with consensus recommendations for breast cancer therapies in several Canadian provinces. However, a recent study concluded that the publication of the Canadian CPGs did not reduce variations in surgical care for breast cancer. If guidelines are to achieve their intended objectives, they must be implemented in ways that support, encourage, and facilitate their use. Evidence strongly suggests the simple publication and passive dissemination of CPGs are usually ineffective in changing how physicians actually care for patients. CPG implementation, therefore, requires active knowledge translation processes to ensure that the evidence is relevant to all with a stake in bettering breast cancer care. For example, implementation strategies that use computerized CPGs can make evidence-based decision-making routine practice in the clinical setting. The breast cancer community can also work with the newly formed Canadian Partnership Against Cancer to find ways to more successfully support and facilitate guideline use considering the local context.
1998年,加拿大发布了一系列具体的临床实践指南(CPG)。这些《乳腺癌护理与治疗临床实践指南》的一个主要目标是减少全国乳腺癌护理的差异。在此之前,研究人员发现加拿大几个省份对乳腺癌治疗的共识性建议的遵循程度一般。然而,最近一项研究得出结论,加拿大CPG的发布并未减少乳腺癌手术护理的差异。如果指南要实现其预期目标,就必须以支持、鼓励和促进其使用的方式来实施。有力证据表明,简单地发布和被动传播CPG通常在改变医生实际照顾患者的方式方面是无效的。因此,CPG的实施需要积极的知识转化过程,以确保证据与所有参与改善乳腺癌护理的人相关。例如,使用计算机化CPG的实施策略可以使基于证据的决策成为临床环境中的常规做法。乳腺癌领域也可以与新成立的加拿大抗癌伙伴关系合作,考虑当地情况,找到更成功地支持和促进指南使用的方法。