• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生如何决定为患者转介辅助癌症治疗?一项定性研究的方案。

How do surgeons decide to refer patients for adjuvant cancer treatment? Protocol for a qualitative study.

机构信息

Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 25;7:102. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-102.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-7-102
PMID:23098262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3503754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer are commonly diagnosed cancers in Canada. Patients diagnosed with early-stage non-small cell lung, breast, or colorectal cancer represent potentially curable populations. For these patients, surgery is the primary mode of treatment, with (neo)adjuvant therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy) recommended according to disease stage. Data from our research in Nova Scotia, as well as others', demonstrate that a substantial proportion of non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer patients, for whom practice guidelines recommend (neo)adjuvant therapy, are not referred for an oncologist consultation. Conversely, surveillance data and clinical experience suggest that breast cancer patients have much higher referral rates. Since surgery is the primary treatment, the surgeon plays a major role in referring patients to oncologists. Thus, an improved understanding of how surgeons make decisions related to oncology services is important to developing strategies to optimize referral rates. Few studies have examined decision making for (neo)adjuvant therapy from the perspective of the cancer surgeon. This study will use qualitative methods to examine decision-making processes related to referral to oncology services for individuals diagnosed with potentially curable non-small cell lung, breast, or colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative study will be conducted, guided by the principles of grounded theory. The study design is informed by our ongoing research, as well as a model of access to health services. The method of data collection will be in-depth, semi structured interviews. We will attempt to recruit all lung, breast, and/or colorectal cancer surgeons in Nova Scotia (n ≈ 42), with the aim of interviewing a minimum of 34 surgeons. Interviews will be audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data will be collected and analyzed concurrently, with two investigators independently coding and analyzing the data. Analysis will involve an inductive, grounded approach using constant comparative analysis.

DISCUSSION

The primary outcomes will be (1) identification of the patient, surgeon, institutional, and health-system factors that influence surgeons' decisions to refer non-small cell lung, breast, and colorectal cancer patients to oncology services when consideration for (neo)adjuvant therapy is recommended and (2) identification of potential strategies that could optimize referral to oncology for appropriate individuals.

摘要

背景

非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌是加拿大常见的诊断癌症。诊断为早期非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌或结直肠癌的患者代表了潜在可治愈的人群。对于这些患者,手术是主要的治疗方式,根据疾病阶段推荐(新)辅助治疗(例如化疗、放疗)。我们在新斯科舍省以及其他地方的研究数据表明,相当一部分非小细胞肺癌和结直肠癌患者,其临床指南建议进行(新)辅助治疗,但并未转诊给肿瘤医生进行咨询。相反,监测数据和临床经验表明,乳腺癌患者的转诊率要高得多。由于手术是主要的治疗方法,因此外科医生在将患者转介给肿瘤医生方面发挥着重要作用。因此,深入了解外科医生如何做出与肿瘤服务相关的决策对于制定优化转诊率的策略非常重要。很少有研究从癌症外科医生的角度研究(新)辅助治疗的决策。本研究将使用定性方法来检查与为诊断为潜在可治愈的非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌或结直肠癌的个体转介至肿瘤服务相关的决策过程。

方法

一项定性研究将在扎根理论原则的指导下进行。该研究设计是基于我们正在进行的研究以及获得卫生服务的模型。数据收集方法将是深入的半结构化访谈。我们将尝试招募新斯科舍省所有的肺癌、乳腺癌和/或结直肠癌外科医生(n≈42),目标是至少采访 34 名外科医生。访谈将进行录音并逐字转录。数据将同时收集和分析,两名研究人员独立对数据进行编码和分析。分析将采用归纳的、扎根的方法,使用恒定性比较分析。

讨论

主要结果将是(1)确定影响外科医生在推荐(新)辅助治疗时决定将非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者转介至肿瘤服务的患者、外科医生、机构和卫生系统因素,以及(2)确定可优化适当患者向肿瘤学转诊的潜在策略。

相似文献

1
How do surgeons decide to refer patients for adjuvant cancer treatment? Protocol for a qualitative study.外科医生如何决定为患者转介辅助癌症治疗?一项定性研究的方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 25;7:102. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-102.
2
Decision-making by surgeons about referral for adjuvant therapy for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast or colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.外科医生对非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌或结直肠癌患者辅助治疗转诊的决策:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jan 12;4(1):E7-E12. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150030. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
3
Decision making and referral from primary care for possible lung and colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences.初级保健中针对可能的肺癌和结直肠癌的决策与转诊:一项关于患者经历的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e775-82. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682849.
4
Referral of breast cancer patients to medical oncologists after initial surgical management.乳腺癌患者在初始手术治疗后转诊至肿瘤内科医生处。
Med Care. 2000 Jul;38(7):696-704. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200007000-00002.
5
Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in incompletely resected (R1) early stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a European survey conducted by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) young oncologists committee.辅助化疗(CT)和放疗(RT)在未完全切除(R1)的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的应用:欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)青年肿瘤学家委员会进行的一项欧洲调查。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Jul;85(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
6
Residual treatment disparities after oncology referral for rectal cancer.直肠癌肿瘤转诊后的残留治疗差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):738-44. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn145. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care.一个旨在减少乳腺癌护理中种族差异的跟踪与反馈登记系统。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1717-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn387. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: Factors Influencing Surgeons' Referrals.乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗:影响外科医生转诊的因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3510-3517. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5296-y. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Older patients and adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: surgeon knowledge, opinions, and practice.老年患者与结直肠癌辅助治疗:外科医生的知识、观点和实践。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):335-41. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ff43d6.
10
Exploring patient experiences of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.探索乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者的经历。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary approach to cancer care in Rwanda: the role of tumour board meetings.卢旺达癌症护理的多学科方法:肿瘤委员会会议的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 Mar 6;17:1515. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1515. eCollection 2023.
2
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: Factors Influencing Surgeons' Referrals.乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗:影响外科医生转诊的因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3510-3517. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5296-y. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis.在加拿大一个省份,遵循结直肠癌辅助化疗临床实践指南的情况:一项基于人群的分析。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):253-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000578.
2
Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for patients with colorectal cancer in Nova Scotia.基于人群的新斯科舍省结直肠癌患者随访护理的纵向研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):246-52. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000491.
3
Reflections on knowledge brokering within a multidisciplinary research team.关于多学科研究团队中知识中介作用的思考。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Fall;31(4):283-90. doi: 10.1002/chp.20128.
4
Improving nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: so what?提高结直肠癌的淋巴结检出率:那又怎样?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1066-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2073-9. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Adoption of surgical innovations: factors influencing use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.外科创新的采用:影响乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检使用的因素
Surg Innov. 2011 Dec;18(4):379-86. doi: 10.1177/1553350611409063. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Coordination of breast cancer care between radiation oncologists and surgeons: a survey study.放疗科医生和外科医生之间乳腺癌治疗的协调:一项调查研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):2072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
7
Breast Cancer Guidelines in Canada: A Review of Development and Implementation.加拿大乳腺癌指南:制定与实施综述
Breast Care (Basel). 2008;3(2):108-113. doi: 10.1159/000121732. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
8
Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.组织和政策领域中的知识交流过程:文献的叙述性系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):444-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00608.x.
9
Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors.基于人群的乳腺癌幸存者随访护理纵向研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2010 Jul;6(4):174-81. doi: 10.1200/JOP.200009.
10
Characteristics of patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who fail to receive guideline-recommended treatment.III 期结肠癌患者未能接受指南推荐治疗的特征。
Cancer. 2010 Oct 15;116(20):4849-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25250.