Zitzelsberger Louise, Grunfeld Eva, Graham Ian D
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Nov 15;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-25.
Family physicians (FPs) play an important role in cancer control. While FPs' attitudes towards, and use of guidelines in general have been explored, no study has looked at the needs of FPs with respect to guidelines for the continuum of cancer control. The objective of this study was to understand which guideline topics FPs consider important.
Five group interviews were conducted by telephone with FPs from across Ontario, Canada. Transcripts were analyzed inductively. Content analysis identified emergent themes. Themes are illustrated by representative quotes taken from the transcripts.
The main areas where FPs felt guidelines were needed most included screening - a traditional area of responsibility for FPs - and treatment and follow-up - areas where they felt they lacked the knowledge to best support patients. Confusion over best practice when faced with conflicting guidelines varied according to disease site. FPs defined good guideline formats; the most often cited forms of presentation were tear-off sheets to use interactively with patients, or a binder. Computer-based dissemination was acknowledged as the best way of widely distributing material that needs frequent updates. However, until computer use is a common aspect of practice, mail was considered the most viable method of dissemination. Guidelines designed for use by patients were supported by FPs.
Preferred guideline topics, format, dissemination methods and role of patient guidelines identified by FPs in this study reflect the nature of their practice situations. Guideline developers and those supporting use of evidence-based guidelines (e.g., Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control) have a responsibility to ensure that FPs are provided with the resources they identify as important, and to provide them in a format that will best support their use.
家庭医生在癌症控制中发挥着重要作用。虽然已经探讨了家庭医生对指南的态度及其总体使用情况,但尚无研究关注家庭医生在癌症连续控制指南方面的需求。本研究的目的是了解家庭医生认为哪些指南主题很重要。
通过电话对来自加拿大安大略省各地的家庭医生进行了五次小组访谈。对访谈记录进行归纳分析。内容分析确定了新出现的主题。主题通过从访谈记录中选取的代表性引语来说明。
家庭医生认为最需要指南的主要领域包括筛查——这是家庭医生的传统职责领域——以及治疗和随访——他们觉得自己在这些领域缺乏为患者提供最佳支持所需的知识。面对相互冲突的指南时,最佳实践的困惑因疾病部位而异。家庭医生定义了良好的指南格式;最常被提及的呈现形式是可与患者互动使用的便签纸或活页夹。基于计算机的传播被认为是广泛分发需要频繁更新的材料的最佳方式。然而,在计算机使用成为实践的普遍方面之前,邮件被认为是最可行的传播方法。家庭医生支持为患者设计的指南。
本研究中家庭医生确定的首选指南主题、格式、传播方法以及患者指南的作用反映了他们的实践情况的性质。指南制定者和那些支持使用循证指南的人(如加拿大癌症控制战略)有责任确保为家庭医生提供他们认为重要的资源,并以最能支持其使用的格式提供这些资源。